occasionally one requires to download a 50-100 GB file in several seconds
120 mins of a 4K movie/tv file can be up to 100Gb but it is unclear to me why it would be necessary to download such a file in its entirety is a couple of seconds? You can stream it live quite easily over a 50Mbps service. I tend t do larger downloads as a background task.
Australia is behind most OECD countries for internet speed reliability and CVC
For mobile internet we are ranked 5th in the OECD, Australia has always had one of the highest mobile uptakes as a % of population in the world; and we have surprisingly good coverage given the size of our country and small population.
Our nbn fibre is no less reliable than anyone other countries fibre.
CVC is an artificial constraint introduced as nbn were directed to charge based on speed used whereas most of the world charge based on data usage. It was designed so that speed limits could allow for tiered pricing; .meaning that low volume users (i.e. oldies who only make phone calls or just read a website or two) had an option for a basic service, and those who want more speed (and therefore use a lot more data) could opt to pay more.
Removing CVC and introducing usage charges would be fairer in my opinion. Other countries who do not have CVC, do not guarantee minimum speeds (its rarity globally to see residential services based on speed), instead they operate similar to our mobile network in that you get the best available at any point in time (depending on congestion etc), except where you usage has exceeded your plan and you then get throttled to a much slower speed or pay for more data.
There has been a huge land grab for customers with some dodgy providers lowered prices to below ADSL costs and put customers on lowest speed tier which was really meant for voice only services and did not advise this is less than some adsl services to attract price sensitive customers. The ACC has clamped down on that practice.
The OECD fixed line internet measurements are averaged across all fixed line services so in Australia that means adsl, fttn/b, fttc, hfc and fttp; and are also based on what people choose to purchase so our ranking is lower in part because others dont buy based on speed.
Also need to understand that OECD stats do not include homes without a fixed line or mobile service, that is why some 3rd world places rank highly on avg speed as that average speed is measured across the tiny % of the population who can actually get internet. Most of countries ahead of us though have large populations concentrated in much smaller area, which makes roll-out more efficient. The reason we had to have an nbn is because the big telcos were never going to offer high speed services everywhere, rather just where it was profitable for them to do so.
The nbn has given aussies more choice of providers, and the erosion of Telstra and Optus cable broadband duopoly, has actually driven them to start down the 5G path (and improve their 4G) faster to provide more competition to fixed line. We should see our ranking improve as the roll-out finishes and the next round of upgrades start.