paulthegolfer
Junior Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Posts
- 23
Re: What's your prediction on the Australian Dollar?
Could Abbott be the new Hewson?
Could Abbott be the new Hewson?
We can only hope. He is after all a peacock preening himself and believes he is born to rule.Could Abbott be the new Hewson?
What is even more impressive is that 11% of Germany is faster!JAL Sakura Lounge @ FRA
8.50am
ping 12ms
down 41.65Mb/s
up 9.02Mb/s
Not bad!
What is even more impressive is that 11% of Germany is faster!
Is Tony Abbott reading this?
"I feel the need, the need for speed"!I hope he's too busy not planning to spend my taxes on infrastructure that goes beyond what's necessary for most punters. Giving everyone a taxpayer-paid Ferrari when I only actually need a BMW 7 Series is beyond a waste, especially with the current budgetary situation. If anyone wants a Ferrari instead, they should spend their own money.
"I feel the need, the need for speed"!
Top Gun reference.you cant be that young!!!!
I hope he's too busy not planning to spend my taxes on infrastructure that goes beyond what's necessary for most punters. Giving everyone a taxpayer-paid Ferrari when I only actually need a BMW 7 Series is beyond a waste, especially with the current budgetary situation. If anyone wants a Ferrari instead, they should spend their own money.
We won't agree I suspect, and not to hijack the thread, but presently I run my two (small, laptop and personal interaction based) businesses perfectly well off the 3G network because I live out-of-town and don't have ADSL even. (And neither premises will get the NBN!) Would love to have greater speed, but I do get by perfectly well. When I'm in Canada or Germany I get access to much higher speeds, but my laptop work honestly doesn't get 2x or 3x or 10x more efficient or productive. I think in your analogy dial-up would be rubber bands (the minimum technology for propulsion / minimum internet) but the alternatives being offered by the 2 major parties only differ in whether we go much faster or super-dooper fast. I'd rather go much faster and have it cost a bundle, than going faster again where the cost is commensurately greater but I can't actually notice the difference. (and others use for fiber speeds acknowledged - just talking about my own uses / opinions.)Strange analogy. It reminds me of a little race I had with one of my teachers along Sheridan st in cairns one day. Managed to just beat him to the next set of lights. He pulls up, in his mighty boy and says I would have had you but one of the rubber bands broke.
You're not being offered a 7 series, you're being offered a mighty boy - goes ok, until a rubber band breaks.
Top Gun reference.
I hope he's too busy not planning to spend my taxes on infrastructure that goes beyond what's necessary for most punters. Giving everyone a taxpayer-paid Ferrari when I only actually need a BMW 7 Series is beyond a waste, especially with the current budgetary situation. If anyone wants a Ferrari instead, they should spend their own money.
We won't agree I suspect, and not to hijack the thread, but presently I run my two (small, laptop and personal interaction based) businesses perfectly well off the 3G network because I live out-of-town and don't have ADSL even. (And neither premises will get the NBN!) Would love to have greater speed, but I do get by perfectly well. When I'm in Canada or Germany I get access to much higher speeds, but my laptop work honestly doesn't get 2x or 3x or 10x more efficient or productive. I'd rather go much faster and have it cost a bundle, than going faster again where the cost is commensurately greater but I can't actually notice the difference. (and others use for fiber speeds acknowledged - just talking about my own uses / opinions.)
the alternatives being offered by the 2 major parties only differ in whether we go much faster or super-dooper fast.
I think the coalition policy is sensible in the respect that if they win government they would be presented with a half constructed fait accomplie and rather than dismantle what has been constructed they are taking a more sensible cost/benifit approach....
To finish on a more positive note, despite my head-banging above, I am so pleased that you didn't say we should just do it wirelessly instead - and even more pleased that the coalition seems to have finally dropped this piece of stupidity too.
The NBN is going to make no difference to my Internet speed and live in a suburb close to Sydney. Not sure where the direct benefit to me is...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I think the coalition policy is sensible in the respect that if they win government they would be presented with a half constructed fait accomplie and rather than dismantle what has been constructed they are taking a more sensible cost/benifit approach.
Given the government's continually revised costing I put more credence in Turnbull's $96B estimate.
No matter how the NBN is funded, the current concept is still going to cost me significant $$$ in internal cabling equipment costs to simply retain the telephone/internet service/speeds I have now.
Should I just have it because "it will be good for me"?
Are you on 100Mbit Telstra cable Simon? If so, the big difference is NBN upstream is ~17 times faster than Cable (2.4Mbit vs 40Mbit). Upstream is what many people need for reasons mentioned by others above.
No - I am on ADSL2+ (with iinet). I can not get cable in the current property (but hoping to move next year so maybe access to cable).
None of the suburbs connected to mine are scheduled for any construction in the next three years based on the NBN.