- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Posts
- 27,985
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Platinum
- Star Alliance
- Silver
Re: No more QF chauffer drive to LAX and DFW
(My bolding). I think that's an interesting turn of phrase.
Was CD 'complimentary'? Yes, that could be argued in as much there wasn't any apparent additional charge levied when the service was introduced. But on the other hand it might be argued at it was part of the overall service bundle that is handsomely charged for in a Qantas fare - like baggage, meals, lounges etc. Qantas does make a big deal out of the fact that "everything's included".
I believe few things in a commercial transaction are "free". Normally they are priced in to the overall cost - just like the cost of providing baggage services, in flight meals and lounges by Qantas, compared to some other airlines who charge separately for them.
So, no a 'refund' shouldn't be expected - as in "your CD trip was worth $75, so here's $75 cash back". But some form of compensation is definitely warranted - and the most obvious currency is QFF points. The quantum will always be a matter for debate, but the concept shouldn't be.
And lets talk about 'goodwill', or a 'goodwill gesture' as Red Roo puts it. In accounting (and in simple terms), goodwill is the excess of what is paid for a company over its tangible value. In more everyday use I guess you could say it is giving or allowing something of value to someone which isn't strictly necessary. A 'goodwill gesture' is probably some diminution or abstract of actual goodwill.
But if one has to ask for, or negotiate a 'goodwill gesture', then its value as 'goodwill' is probably zero. I'm sorry, Red Roo, if you are enunciating Qantas' position in respect of compensation for Qantas unilaterally not honouring existing bookings fro CD, then Qantas has no idea of what 'goodwill' means and it shows how totally out of touch Qantas management is with its J and F passengers. What Qantas is talking about isn't a 'goodwill gesture' but buying off a complainant IMHO.
A gesture of goodwill in this case would be what drron mentioned when AA cancelled his flight - an automatic, prompt crediting of points to the account of the person involved, and an e-mail to them. That's the "goodwill" part. The quantum of 'compensation' is another matter.
Firstly, I can assure you that the decision to discontinue Chauffeur Drive between Australia and LAX/DFW from 1 July 2014 was not made lightly.
We value the feedback that we receive from AFF, and have started, but not completed, the call out to affected customers.
As the service is complimentary, we are not in a position to offer any refund in respect of the Chauffeur Drive service. However, our call centre staff do have the ability to explore whether there is a suitable, reasonable goodwill gesture that we can offer affected passengers. I’d be happy to discuss this further with you by private message, or one of contact centre staff will be in touch shortly.
(My bolding). I think that's an interesting turn of phrase.
Was CD 'complimentary'? Yes, that could be argued in as much there wasn't any apparent additional charge levied when the service was introduced. But on the other hand it might be argued at it was part of the overall service bundle that is handsomely charged for in a Qantas fare - like baggage, meals, lounges etc. Qantas does make a big deal out of the fact that "everything's included".
I believe few things in a commercial transaction are "free". Normally they are priced in to the overall cost - just like the cost of providing baggage services, in flight meals and lounges by Qantas, compared to some other airlines who charge separately for them.
So, no a 'refund' shouldn't be expected - as in "your CD trip was worth $75, so here's $75 cash back". But some form of compensation is definitely warranted - and the most obvious currency is QFF points. The quantum will always be a matter for debate, but the concept shouldn't be.
And lets talk about 'goodwill', or a 'goodwill gesture' as Red Roo puts it. In accounting (and in simple terms), goodwill is the excess of what is paid for a company over its tangible value. In more everyday use I guess you could say it is giving or allowing something of value to someone which isn't strictly necessary. A 'goodwill gesture' is probably some diminution or abstract of actual goodwill.
But if one has to ask for, or negotiate a 'goodwill gesture', then its value as 'goodwill' is probably zero. I'm sorry, Red Roo, if you are enunciating Qantas' position in respect of compensation for Qantas unilaterally not honouring existing bookings fro CD, then Qantas has no idea of what 'goodwill' means and it shows how totally out of touch Qantas management is with its J and F passengers. What Qantas is talking about isn't a 'goodwill gesture' but buying off a complainant IMHO.
A gesture of goodwill in this case would be what drron mentioned when AA cancelled his flight - an automatic, prompt crediting of points to the account of the person involved, and an e-mail to them. That's the "goodwill" part. The quantum of 'compensation' is another matter.