medhead
Suspended
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2008
- Posts
- 19,074
What is it with the power that the shoppies union have? They rule SA when Labor is installed and Australia too. Their recent deal on PH trading in the cbd in SA has meant that many establishments now close at 7pm on Christmas and NYE because they can't afford the extreme penalty rates enforced on them. So much for giving people extra payment for working those hours - many places closed so there was no work at all.
They are also extremely bizarre in their views. My wife has recently returned to retail, they offered her a temporary contract over other more senior staff who probably wanted more hours. That staff member refused because their union family/friends have convinced them not to take a contract. Now sure the hourly rate was lower, which was the reasoning to refuse contracts. But that's made up by the longer hours, being paid set hours a week even if sent home and also a higher discount on the products that they must wear. I can only shake my head at the stupidity of unionist who don't even understand the swings and roundabouts. But still their loss, we've enjoyed the extra cash and the extra hours worked in well with my work.
I think Gillard has shown that she is more than happy to over rule (not even tell) the caucus/party what her plans are. So in her case, she would argue most definitely.
I don't really care if Abbot has two mortgages and its surprising how much intimate detail people say they know about his financial situation.
Surely Gillard has to keep things secret to get around the fractions at times. The ALP is ruled by fractions. Giving them a chance to mobilise with pre-information is a bad thing really. I think it is good that she is exercising the power of her position more to make decisions. She is the leader of the country, I expect someone in that position to make decisions without needing to consult every Tom, Dick and Harry. Besides the election date makes no difference, they are going to lose regardless. Trying to ambush with a surprise date will make no difference to that, much better to clear the decks so there can be 5 or 6 months of running the country rather than pathetic speculation.
It terms of mortgages, one little thing that shocked me was Costello coming out after Howard lost to complain about not being able to afford his mortgage with his pay cut. I can't remember the exact figures but he was earning double my pay and had a mortgage that was either the same size or small than mine. I think he also had 2 incomes vs our single income at the time. It just made me wonder about him managing the countries finances, well the dichotomy between his personal and public life.