At a time when every other western country had massive unemployment increases, today you still complaining about the government school building program that kept the building and construction industry from collapse. The mining and housing industry where losing jobs. So the choice was spend billions on unemployment benefits and lose years of new skilled trainees from the industry, or get people out and working. Furthermore, wasn't there something about a family having working parents that encourages the children in the future to work, or create generations of unskilled and unemployed citizens. Real what would you prefer.
Also, not one person I met who got the government help to insulate their roof or get cheap solar power has raised one complaint about it, as they know they got something for nothing and now getting the benefits of not paying high electricity or heating/cooling bills.
Where the fault lies, read today's paper where the problem got back to the last lib gov we had. They sold the farm, and got high tax receipts from over priced minerals. The problem then was not using that money to invest in infrastructure, but give tax cuts to high end groups, and also allow them to double dip with tax rebates. So people today complain about the mining tax and carbon tax. If people are not paying income tax, which was governments primary base of revenue, and people would march in the street if the GST was raised (or all exemptions such as on food were removed), then the government has to raise revenue from new sources. So if I hear one more person complain that their family earning $240,000 + a year now has to pay their own private health insurance, well I have a answer, leave. So which person has made the tough decisions JULIA, and not mr tony.