MEL_Traveller
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Posts
- 28,764
Diplomatic exemptions are just a fact of life. If we think about the flip side, would we want Australia’s ambassador quarantined in a Chinese hotel which unsecured communications and listening devices?
Sports... interesting exemption.
The ‘rich’? I’m not sure it really is an exemption from the requirements in terms of outcomes... just an exemption from government hotel quarantine. The outcome is the same... quarantine under strict conditions. Theoretically I guess any of us could do the same, if we could afford the police, monitoring and everything else that goes with it.
If we could *trust* everyone in home quarantine now it would be a different story... but as we saw in WA, an alleged carrier was out and about driving around in an uber (just because someone says you can’t, doesn’t mean you should!)
Sports... interesting exemption.
The ‘rich’? I’m not sure it really is an exemption from the requirements in terms of outcomes... just an exemption from government hotel quarantine. The outcome is the same... quarantine under strict conditions. Theoretically I guess any of us could do the same, if we could afford the police, monitoring and everything else that goes with it.
If we could *trust* everyone in home quarantine now it would be a different story... but as we saw in WA, an alleged carrier was out and about driving around in an uber (just because someone says you can’t, doesn’t mean you should!)