- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Posts
- 29,375
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Virgin
- Red
They aren't included at all.80% would seem to be unachievable if you consider that there is no vaccine for children under 12 who appear to make up nearly 15% of the total population.
They aren't included at all.80% would seem to be unachievable if you consider that there is no vaccine for children under 12 who appear to make up nearly 15% of the total population.
And why the WHO target is only > 60% total pop (with ~70% or better preferable). Which is is roughly equivalent to our 70%/80% of 16+ (No real surprises there).They aren't included at all.
It's really REALLY SIMPLE. Once every single eligible person has had an opportunity to get both jabs, you allow completely free movement in and out of the country for the fully jabbed only (apart from a handful of dangerous places). It really is as simple as that.Still not seeing a need for home quarantine to be honest. Even with our current vaccination rates, we’re not seeing bodies lining the streets. This is being reaffirmed on a daily basis as a very mild virus. Once we hit 80% vaccination, who exactly is going to die?
The better question is, if we don’t fully reopen then, when will we?
Still not seeing a need for home quarantine to be honest. Even with our current vaccination rates, we’re not seeing bodies lining the streets. This is being reaffirmed on a daily basis as a very mild virus. Once we hit 80% vaccination, who exactly is going to die?
The better question is, if we don’t fully reopen then, when will we?
And given the risk at med hotels, with a fully vaccinated at risk person, likely to have been tested multiple times in recent days, makes perfect sense.Was watching SBS last night and they interviewed the Paralympics indigenous women who won a gold medal.She was in home quarantine in Sydney.
When we had caps and hotel Q people were demanding to allow home Q. Now home Q is on the table people are demanding we scrap that. If ever there's been a slippery slope, this is it.
When we had caps and hotel Q people were demanding to allow home Q. Now home Q is on the table people are demanding we scrap that. If ever there's been a slippery slope, this is it.
hasnt that been the case since the start of the pandemic?Slippery slope started when people with actual covid were allowed to isolate at home.
Nope. In SA, except for the very early days, when the baggage handlers thing broke out, all positives were put into hospital type facilities. Still are. We haven't had many positives.hasnt that been the case since the start of the pandemic?
unless someone required hospital they were left to ride it out at home, outside of i believe QLD.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I would imagine that would become incredibly difficult to maintain logistically if you are keeping them all in negative pressure rooms etc. Like you get a day or two to have it be contained before that becomes impractical. Nice as a goal but across the board cant see it working, look at NZ, went from 0 to 100 in about 3 days.Nope. In SA, except for the very early days, when the baggage handlers thing broke out, all positives were put into hospital type facilities. Still are. We haven't had many positives.
Oh I agree. And then they'd hit the panic button if the med hotel had more than 30 positives. So what do they do? Shut down the numbers of overseas arrivals.I would imagine that would become incredibly difficult to maintain logistically if you are keeping them all in negative pressure rooms etc. Like you get a day or two to have it be contained before that becomes impractical. Nice as a goal but across the board cant see it working, look at NZ, went from 0 to 100 in about 3 days.
In the same article it said the federal government was pushing the states to develop their plans for home quarantine. What? I thought quarantine was a federal government responsibility (or at least it used to be). If states develop the plans we end up with multiple rules, multiple apps, multiple testing regimes etc. Here we go again with the feds absolving themselves of responsibility.Front Page of the SMH - "Vaccine passports available in weeks" - "Australians will begin using an international vaccine passport within weeks to prove their immunisation status overseas and on their return as the Prime Minister flags home quarantine will be key to reopening borders."
Also on the Front page of The Age, but less prominent as "Vaccine passports ready in weeks"
The vaccine certificates exist in the Medicare app and can be displayed from the app, or downloaded into your digital wallet to be displayed.Can someone explain to me how the new vaccine passport being discussed at the moment is different from the existing vaccine certificates we all have. Thanks.
In the same article it said the federal government was pushing the states to develop their plans for home quarantine. What? I thought quarantine was a federal government responsibility (or at least it used to be). If states develop the plans we end up with multiple rules, multiple apps, multiple testing regimes etc. Here we go again with the feds absolving themselves of responsibility.
It seems as they are with the Dictator/Queen of Queensland.They aren't included at all.