Gold Member
Established Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2008
- Posts
- 2,167
I experienced the walk of shame on Friday afternoon at Sydney domestic. I was told the Priority boarding window was already called and has now closed and that there are lots more Platinums in line queued up. Funny that, I left the lounge when the flight was called and still no priority boarding available. I questioned why Qantas would advertise 'board at convenience' for their elites if this was their approach but was basically told 'stiff sh1!t' in a polite manner.
The queue was only ~50 people and took about 4 minutes to progress to the scanners, but it's a matter of principle - honour your stated benefits to those who are apparently your most coveted. If I wasn't travelling business and arrived to the gate a little later I'd be miffed if there was no over head space for my carry-on because non-elites were effectively given priority boarding over me and got their luggage up there first. To that end, and in light of DJs excellent priority boarding, I felt compelled to write to Qantas; I'll share their response with you, if I get one. The cynic inside me says it'll be the usual reassurance of benefit and that they will communicate this with their ground staff/cabin crew that effect the benefit.
My interpretation of this policy is not one of incompetence, actually far from it. I suspect this is a commercial decision based on aircraft turn around time. In their minds they figure if they can stream twice the pax onto the plane in the same time they've got less chance of delays and therefore lower risk of on-time performance if they miss their push back window by 1-2 minutes etc. They might be thinking that if they offered a priority lane they would probably find half the pax are entitled to use it anyway which negates the purpose of 'boarding at convenience'. But if there's no one in the priority line then that scanner/FA can be used to service the non-status line as they are processed when they get to the front of the queue. It would still keep the priority line empty (allowing for true board at convenience for status pax) but would also allow QF to process the same number of BPs in the same time as a line without priority thereby elimiating any turn around time risk. Surely they would have studied this already so if not for this reason, is Qantas really just lazy, unable to communicate/enforce basic expectations among their staff, unwilling to honour their stated benefits, determined to encourage a small percentage to try out and move to DJ, or just incompetent after all?
The queue was only ~50 people and took about 4 minutes to progress to the scanners, but it's a matter of principle - honour your stated benefits to those who are apparently your most coveted. If I wasn't travelling business and arrived to the gate a little later I'd be miffed if there was no over head space for my carry-on because non-elites were effectively given priority boarding over me and got their luggage up there first. To that end, and in light of DJs excellent priority boarding, I felt compelled to write to Qantas; I'll share their response with you, if I get one. The cynic inside me says it'll be the usual reassurance of benefit and that they will communicate this with their ground staff/cabin crew that effect the benefit.
My interpretation of this policy is not one of incompetence, actually far from it. I suspect this is a commercial decision based on aircraft turn around time. In their minds they figure if they can stream twice the pax onto the plane in the same time they've got less chance of delays and therefore lower risk of on-time performance if they miss their push back window by 1-2 minutes etc. They might be thinking that if they offered a priority lane they would probably find half the pax are entitled to use it anyway which negates the purpose of 'boarding at convenience'. But if there's no one in the priority line then that scanner/FA can be used to service the non-status line as they are processed when they get to the front of the queue. It would still keep the priority line empty (allowing for true board at convenience for status pax) but would also allow QF to process the same number of BPs in the same time as a line without priority thereby elimiating any turn around time risk. Surely they would have studied this already so if not for this reason, is Qantas really just lazy, unable to communicate/enforce basic expectations among their staff, unwilling to honour their stated benefits, determined to encourage a small percentage to try out and move to DJ, or just incompetent after all?