The question is what substantive failings (well ventilated in many other threads on this site) are they actually addressing other than saying sorry and providing a few "gifts" as compensation ?
They are fixing and addressing it all though. It's very slow, but they know where they are stuffing up majorly and where the problems need to be fixed.
Of course there are major call centre quality issues, but people contacting the call centre is still very minimal in the grand scheme of things and sheer passenger numbers that travel daily. Just because some AFF members call daily for anything, doesn't mean the general public does.
I also saw somewhere up thread where they were saying that they could contact FJ within 2 rings. Well you are not comparing apples with apples. FJ may have 20-50 flights per day network wide with many small aircraft. Qantas have at least 100 out of SYD in one day.
Another one was comparing SQ with QF, they have one or two flight a day out of each port in Australia, once again not comparing apples with apples.
Irrespective of what some think on here, there is major training and upskilling programs happening in all the contact centres. From going to a Qantas designed product AQIRE to Amadeus ARD which more and more airlines are using.
Baggage handling isn't going to change either, all international carriers in Australia use these contractors (none use their own staff). Also if you actually looked the relevant EBAs, Swissport actually pay a tiny bit more than what was paid at QGS (on a base rate). Another point where some keep saying just employ the old Qantas baggage guys, well most of them would be in their late 50s, early 60s and were more than happy to get their golden handshake.
If Swissport, DNATA, Menzies, CSA, STAR and all the new companies couldn't handle the work, they shouldn't have accepted the tender. Yes Qantas got rid of their own in house employees, but ultimately these companies said they could handle the work and they couldn't, now it's up to Qantas to deal with their mess.