I think it's entirely reasonable to suggest the excessive QF reward surcharges are excessive and disingenuous to the spirit of a FF reward program. The excess charges unquestionably devalue FF points and with QF's notorious lack of international reward availability, it does make a mockery of the QF program to a degree. I'm starting to question whether we jump ship to another FF program for international travel.
I can't see QF reducing them in a hurry though as the FF spinoff division is, as I understand it, the most profitable and sells points like they're giving them away, and while QF needs to work hard to keep the flying division in the black they'll keep charging excessive surcharges. Personally I think we should all complain to the ACCC and agitate for similar surcharge bans that places like HK have.
Bottom line, earning points costs real money and QF advertises (heavily on it's site and via email) that one can redeem points for flights so they damn well should make reward flights available and for the points (only) that they essentially advertise one can do.
I know some people are just reading this thread and thinking all the posters are just whigners, which is probably true to a certain extent,
I do agree with the spirit of FF reward program,
for me, I think rewards program are rewards for your loyalty and years of patronage, which they have made huge profits from
to charge for example $1000 in taxes + 150k points for a $1200 identical flight that can be purchased at the same time and date, to me is borderline false advertising,
sure the airline will justify by saying its a government tax , or a fuel surcharge or an excise.
Personally, like a coffee loyalty card , I want and feel good t hat my 10th coffee is for free,
I would be unhappy on principal if I have 9x cafe lattes takeaway with 2 sugars, and my 10th free bie, they gave me a espresso shot for free, but charged me extra for the milk, sugar, and takeaway container