Qantas boosts international capacity, wet lease Finnair aircraft

This is from Finnair. Crews won’t be live here, pilots are extending the duty for a likely 8 day ish trip. Cabin crew are Asian based.

Finnair pilots will fly scheduled Finnair flights from Helsinki to Singapore and from Helsinki to Bangkok; then, they will continue flying scheduled Qantas flights between Singapore, Bangkok and Sydney before returning to their home base in Helsinki. The cabin crew are provided by Finnair partners based in Singapore and Bangkok, and the aircraft maintenance is performed by Finnair partners at the Qantas destinations.
 
I know both Qantas and Finnair use Panasonic eX3 IFE systems, but I assume by this statement they mean it will have Qantas' user interface and media library. Would they actually be re-programming the IFE system in Singapore every stop to switch between Qantas and Finnair systems?
I think you'll find the two A330s will be based in Australia and be cycled only periodically as required for maintenance reasons. I'd expect the same plane to stay on the same route going back and forth for weeks at a time. So small things like reprogramming the IFE won't have to be done that frequently.

No different to NZ173/174 between AKL-PER-AKL which just shuttles back and forth daily with the same aircraft, wet leased from Wamos Air.

As noted elsewhere, HEL-SIN/BKK use the A350, so these flights would need to subbed for any plane transfer (or more likely, plane could be ferried empty or as an additional flight from asia to HEL and vv).
 
This is from Finnair. Crews won’t be live here, pilots are extending the duty for a likely 8 day ish trip. Cabin crew are Asian based.
Finnair pilots will fly scheduled Finnair flights from Helsinki to Singapore and from Helsinki to Bangkok; then, they will continue flying scheduled Qantas flights between Singapore, Bangkok and Sydney before returning to their home base in Helsinki. The cabin crew are provided by Finnair partners based in Singapore and Bangkok, and the aircraft maintenance is performed by Finnair partners at the Qantas destinations.

If the crew (flight deck &/or cabin) lived here (that is Australia) that would bring all sorts of issues with work permits, AU tax, AU union agreements and more. That is never going to happen.

The matching AY media report ---> Finnair to lease two A330 aircraft to oneworld partner Qantas
<snip>
During the wet lease period, the aircraft will be deployed in Qantas’ network on routes from Sydney and Singapore as well as Sydney and Bangkok. Finnair pilots will fly scheduled Finnair flights from Helsinki to Singapore and from Helsinki to Bangkok; then, they will continue flying scheduled Qantas flights between Singapore, Bangkok and Sydney before returning to their home base in Helsinki. The cabin crew are provided by Finnair partners based in Singapore and Bangkok, and the aircraft maintenance is performed by Finnair partners at the Qantas destinations. Finnair has secured sufficient pilot resources to match its fleet size, including the aircraft leased to Qantas. The Qantas agreement does not impact the number of cabin crew at Finnair, as they are fully deployed in other operations.
<snip>
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Yeah, Id be keen to know why this and a formal JV/codeshare weren't a preferable option - maybe qf didn't want to give up the traffic?

They could do one of SIN or BKK but not both.

Australia/Finland Air Services agreement is capped at 2800 seats per week, or 400 per day.

The full treaty isn’t available online so I don’t even know if they have 5th freedom rights.
 
Would be this the first time Qantas has wet-leased aircraft for its international routes? I know they used some British Airways 747 in the early 2000s, but that appeared to be a dry lease.


I don't remember the contractual basis, but Cathay operated some Hong Kong service for Qantas when the A380s were grounded.
 
"cabin crew are provided by Finnair partners based in Singapore and Bangkok,"

Sounds like labour hire companies.
AY has had outsourced Cabin Crew at SIN and HKG for a long time now.

I assume its those crews that will be doing the wet lease flights just the same as they currently do SIN-HEL etc
 
Would be this the first time Qantas has wet-leased aircraft for its international routes?
Do the freight only Atlas 747s count?

However no it's not a first in fact there are multiple examples over the years but yes they are few and far between.

In 2001 Qantas wet-leased 7 767-300s from Air Canada to operated across the Tasman and Pacific

Back in the 80s QF leased a DC-10 from Martinair Holland. It operated it operated on SYD-BNE-SIN flights for about 3 months.

In the late 50's/early 60s a BA Comet was also leased to QF.
 
Do the freight only Atlas 747s count?

However no it's not a first in fact there are multiple examples over the years but yes they are few and far between.

In 2001 Qantas wet-leased 7 767-300s from Air Canada to operated across the Tasman and Pacific

Back in the 80s QF leased a DC-10 from Martinair Holland. It operated it operated on SYD-BNE-SIN flights for about 3 months.

In the late 50's/early 60s a BA Comet was also leased to QF.
Also during the 80s Qantas leased a Tower Air 747-200. Believe it was a dry lease, IIRC.

Also a complicated leasing arrangement with a QF 747-200 painted in (then) Air Pacific colours. IIRC operated the old QF29/30 SYD/DPS/JKT (HLP as it is known now) v.v.
 
Personally I’m more excited by Brisbane Wellington for business purposes for our QLD based team, no more routing via the other caps.
 
DRW has DIL at least 🤣
ADL is far bigger than CBR and DRW combined and QF give us absolutely nothing 🤬

It’s not about population though.

Poor relative yield, has been that way for years. ADL needs to get more $, more corporates, business, HNWIs etc etc etc. As you probably know :)

The token i-flying that ADL gets now is by carriers not constrained by Australian laws and subsequent cost bases that we incur here to our disadvantage, meaning more services out of higher yielding ports where there is still demand to be soaked up / stolen from other carriers will always be preference over ADL. Certain carriers are also heavily subsidised by hook or crook but let’s not go there…

It’s not personal, it’s just business economics :)
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top