simongr
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2006
- Posts
- 14,307
Anyone know which lounge this is?
It sort of looks like DRW
Anyone know which lounge this is?
It sort of looks like DRW
It may be CBR.
Looks like CNS
It's the carpet that narrows it down to a large, new/recently refurbished venue. However I cannot recall such furniture/window/panel arrangement in MEL, ADL, SYD or BNE. (Although I have not been in the SYD QP, as distinct from the J lounge, since the J lounge opened.)...
I must get out more.
Anyone know which lounge this is?
And sandals!The QC Lounge needs to go more RSL 70's style. Those wearing shorts should wear full knee high socks.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Why are "open feet" rude but not open hands? And what do thongs have to do with U.S. security?Last time I flew into the US, we were told to put our shoes on and take our seats one hour from landing due to Homeland Security or FAA regulation. So to the fools who wear thongs/flip flops or whatever they are known by in your kneck of the woods, think again. It is your feet that you are risking. It is rude to expect others to tolerate your open feet.By all means wear the foot socks or gloves provided by the airline or buy your own.
Where is the line to be a "horrible person?" Is it enough to just wear thongs, or must one also be bare-chested?As for attire in lounges, where do you draw the line ? What next bare (bear) torsos on men I see so many men seeming to want to display their hair, tatts and muscles etc in public these days? Surely smart casual means just that, not bikie/punk filth. Offensive T shirt slogans too should not be allowed. Surely Security can take care of any who wish to cause offence when refused entry.
The lounges are meant to be a haven from the masses out in the terminals. So what is the point of joining if these horrible people are let in ?
Well, thongs seem to be OK in U.S. and B.A. lounges. Bare feet, too, from what I've seen.[/QUOTE]I doubt if the wearing of thongs, filthy attire or bare chested men would be allowed in any US or British Lounge or airline.
The proper way to deal with this is to be aware of and acknowledge it, but discount it. If you see someone and have an initial negative "gut" reaction, ask yourself (quietly!) "Why?" Is it because of a stereotype picked up earlier in life? If so, discount it and move on. That's how we advance as a society beyond prejudice.Basic psychology identifies that when we meet someone we initially judge them, deliberately or otherwise. If the only criteria we have is looks then that is how it happens. Individually we may or may not like it but that is how it happens in real life.
As a way of making this easier, also require that males be shirtless and females wear no more than a tube top. Only those with attractive physiques are admitted. That should make the dress code much easier to enforce. Security is easier, too.How about we go further, (and I am digressing here), and don't allow fat people in the lounge or on the aircraft for that matter
Ever notice how virtually every public Internet access site, even free ones, require that you agree to their t&c before gaining access? Well, (aside from the fact that the intercept mechanism is itself a security attack, and aside from the fact that the content of the t&c is pointless), much of the t&c boil down to agreeing that, when accessing the Internet, you might be exposed to content you find offensive. By clicking though, you accept this.The rest of the thread clearly shows there will be people who are disgusted at the dress standards of others whilst others will be wondering what the problem is with the others. The former will accuse QF of holding poor standards of accountability with respect to dress, whilst the latter will complain to QF for being victimised about their dress. In either case, QF cannot win and will almost certainly be viewed as a failure in this respect.
Now you try and tell me - if you were the person who was supposed to enforce the dress standards in the QP, what would you do that would not frustrate or infuriate a single patron so that if you were enforcing the standards you might actually be viewed as doing your job correctly?
Cairns domestic terminal.which QC was this in?
And we have a winner!!!!That's CNS, pretty sure. You walk in from Reception on the left-hand side of the first photo, where the screen is mounted, and the restrooms/showers are the 2 doors on the right behing that separation wall.
Let's face it, bare feet is almost being overdressed in FNQ!Cairns domestic terminal.
CNS. Cairns, domestic terminal.Anyone know which lounge this is?
I was very amused by the signs at the workstations explaining Mac equivalents for Windows things.I am happy to stand corrected, but by the look of the floor and those computer workstations it looks like the back of DRW........
Looks like CNS
Indeed, Brisbane Flyer is our lucky winner! Good call! Tell him what he's won, serfty.And we have a winner!!!!
Let's face it, bare feet is almost being overdressed in FNQ!
So, if it were my job, I'd make it a condition of the t&c that you agree that people may wear clothes that wouldn't be acceptable at your golf club, and if you don't like it, stick to your country club. (I'd also try to enforce rules based on conduct, such as being loud.)
No disagreement however this frequently does not happen with many people.The proper way to deal with this is to be aware of and acknowledge it, but discount it. If you see someone and have an initial negative "gut" reaction, ask yourself (quietly!) "Why?" Is it because of a stereotype picked up earlier in life? If so, discount it and move on. That's how we advance as a society beyond prejudice.