Melburnian1
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Posts
- 25,255
Why can't QF9 run on time?
FlightStats - Global Flight Tracker, Status Tracking and Airport Information lists punctuality performance for QF9, 1525 ex MEL for DXB and LHR as 'unavailable' but if the past four days are anything to go by, QF9 has a poor timekeeping perfomance.
On Thursday 11 July, QF9 departed MEL 22 minutes late but arrived LHR (+ 1) 66 minutes late. On Friday 12, it departed on time, arriving LHR 16 minutes early, so credit should be given for that. On Saturday 13 July, it departed 77 minutes late, arriving LHR 73 minutes behind time. Today, it left MEL 43 minutes late and is still on the way to DXB.
Just one out of four of this QF A388 flight having good punctuality is not satisfactory.
In comparison, a major competitor, SQ228, departed MEL on Friday 12 July on time at 1545, arriving SIN two minutes late at 2147.
On both Saturday 13 and today, Sunday 14, SQ228 departed MEL four minutes early, respectively arriving SIN three minutes early and being forecast to arrive 18 minutes early (though the latter may not always be achieved if ATC slows her down or if there is a queue to get into Changi).
The connecting flight to SQ228, SQ322, departed SIN one minute late on Friday 12 July, arriving LHR 25 minutes early at 0530 the following morning. On Saturday 13 July, SQ322 departed one minute early, arriving LHR 15 minutes early. Tonight's SQ322 is still nine hours from departure while SQ only publishes flight status for up to two days ago, not three as QF does, so I cannot access Thursday's performance.
FlightStats - Global Flight Tracker, Status Tracking and Airport Information gives SQ228 a 96 per cent on time rating, better than 85 per cent of comparable flights. The rating for SQ322 is not nearly as good.
Delays can be caused by anything from a plane going 'tech' to a passenger with luggage in the hold failing to front or a crew member going off sick at the last moment, but what is stopping QF9 from reliably departing (i.e. pushback) on time (given that the very generous 'on time' definition is '15 minutes or less late departing' or arriving, as the case may be)?
It doesn't surprise me that SQ has added a fourth daily frequency between SIN and MEL.
FlightStats - Global Flight Tracker, Status Tracking and Airport Information lists punctuality performance for QF9, 1525 ex MEL for DXB and LHR as 'unavailable' but if the past four days are anything to go by, QF9 has a poor timekeeping perfomance.
On Thursday 11 July, QF9 departed MEL 22 minutes late but arrived LHR (+ 1) 66 minutes late. On Friday 12, it departed on time, arriving LHR 16 minutes early, so credit should be given for that. On Saturday 13 July, it departed 77 minutes late, arriving LHR 73 minutes behind time. Today, it left MEL 43 minutes late and is still on the way to DXB.
Just one out of four of this QF A388 flight having good punctuality is not satisfactory.
In comparison, a major competitor, SQ228, departed MEL on Friday 12 July on time at 1545, arriving SIN two minutes late at 2147.
On both Saturday 13 and today, Sunday 14, SQ228 departed MEL four minutes early, respectively arriving SIN three minutes early and being forecast to arrive 18 minutes early (though the latter may not always be achieved if ATC slows her down or if there is a queue to get into Changi).
The connecting flight to SQ228, SQ322, departed SIN one minute late on Friday 12 July, arriving LHR 25 minutes early at 0530 the following morning. On Saturday 13 July, SQ322 departed one minute early, arriving LHR 15 minutes early. Tonight's SQ322 is still nine hours from departure while SQ only publishes flight status for up to two days ago, not three as QF does, so I cannot access Thursday's performance.
FlightStats - Global Flight Tracker, Status Tracking and Airport Information gives SQ228 a 96 per cent on time rating, better than 85 per cent of comparable flights. The rating for SQ322 is not nearly as good.
Delays can be caused by anything from a plane going 'tech' to a passenger with luggage in the hold failing to front or a crew member going off sick at the last moment, but what is stopping QF9 from reliably departing (i.e. pushback) on time (given that the very generous 'on time' definition is '15 minutes or less late departing' or arriving, as the case may be)?
It doesn't surprise me that SQ has added a fourth daily frequency between SIN and MEL.