Coal fired A340-600s. They’re big planes. Well long. Longer than an B744 and an A380!Would've been back when VS had the A380s on order if they did consider it. VS previously flew LHR-HKG-SYD with the gas-guzzling A340s prior to the (now-cancelled) A380 order.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
My understanding is SYD-LHR is far more marginal than LHR-SYD, but if you are flying East that possibly disappears.AKL-LHR is even further than SYD-LHR which is already marginal.
My understanding is LHR-SYD is far more marginal than SYD-LHR, but if you are flying West that possibly disappears.
And Yes. NZ sold its LHR slots, So maybe LGW instead.
But that would be competing against SQBut my guess would be a AKL-SIN-LGW service.
But that would be competing against SQ
Used to be via LAX and via HKG.Unless they codeshare on each other's flights?
But I take your point. Not sure there's a more logical stopover point, unless they return to going via the USA (which some people don't like due to the lack of international transits there).
Was just listening to on air with Dan and Alex. Alex has just let known that because of the success of PER-LHR and that Qantas and Airbus is solving the technical aspect of project sunrise, that 2 other airlines are looking at similar routes. One being BA and the other he can't say yet.
Alex more or less confirmed BA was already in the scoping / planning phase of a direct LHR - Australia route and eyeing the sunrise situation.Could see BA at least having a look if not reach planning stage. VS is less likely with DL at the controls of that carrier, going East for new Long Haul routes for them would be lower in priority for VS/DL.