anat0l
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Posts
- 11,669
Just sent in my application today. First non-Amex card I've applied for in quite a while. Main thing working against me is the length of time in my current job... sucks being a career changer. I only asked for a $6k limit; not sure what is the use in having a higher one (don't usually make any multi-thousand dollar payments), plus I'm not sure if having higher credit limits altogether reflects badly on one's credit.
The documentation requirements are a load of bull. 60 day maximum age of issue of document? For payslips, employment contracts or letters of employment? What kind of rocks in the head do the people at Citi have? Granted, the banks have been dragged over the coals by the government for not checking people thoroughly enough as to whether they are fit to hold a line of credit, but this is nuts.
I get paid monthly, so the second last payslip I have would either be just inside or just outside the 60 day "limit". Most people only get one employment contract at the start of their job, rendering that as not an ideal document unless you just started the job. Then they expect you just to go to your employer and ask for proof of employment, because a copy of an original contract, payslips and the fact they have the employer details aren't good enough? I'll stick with "rocks in their head" because the piece of my mind description would be against the ToS.
Some of this rant may have already been discussed previously.
The documentation requirements are a load of bull. 60 day maximum age of issue of document? For payslips, employment contracts or letters of employment? What kind of rocks in the head do the people at Citi have? Granted, the banks have been dragged over the coals by the government for not checking people thoroughly enough as to whether they are fit to hold a line of credit, but this is nuts.
I get paid monthly, so the second last payslip I have would either be just inside or just outside the 60 day "limit". Most people only get one employment contract at the start of their job, rendering that as not an ideal document unless you just started the job. Then they expect you just to go to your employer and ask for proof of employment, because a copy of an original contract, payslips and the fact they have the employer details aren't good enough? I'll stick with "rocks in their head" because the piece of my mind description would be against the ToS.
Some of this rant may have already been discussed previously.