Qatar denied extra capacity into Australia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alan Joyce will not be forced to appear before a second parliamentary inquiry after the coalition was defeated a vote this afternoon in the Senate by 34-31.
I’d like to know the justification of the 34 senators who voted against this .
 
Alan Joyce will not be forced to appear before a second parliamentary inquiry after the coalition was defeated a vote this afternoon in the Senate by 34-31.
I’d like to know the justification of the 34 senators who voted against this .
Because it’s pointless point scoring exercise. A waste of everyone’s time and money.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alan Joyce will not be forced to appear before a second parliamentary inquiry after the coalition was defeated a vote this afternoon in the Senate by 34-31.
I’d like to know the justification of the 34 senators who voted against this .
As if the Govt. were going to make their mate face the music
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As if the Govt. were going to make their mate face the music
Lets not forget he has been the governments mate prior to the change last year so it's grandstanding from all sides. Both sides of politics are mud slingers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As if the Govt. were going to make their mate face the music

There’s no point in AJ being the political football anymore and he would not have said anything interesting anyway.

Time to move on from political stunts.

Out of the current senate enquiry, it’s good to see the current government is bringing back ACCC oversight of airlines. That’s one of the best mechanisms rather than political grandstanding.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did spend a while ploughing through today's Hansard seeking an answer to @kelvedon 's question. It's not there yet but I can confirm there has been plenty of political points scoring all round.

Senators also noting that discussions with Qatar are continuing at an official (departmental) level. The nature of this game is that the show is ongoing while at least one of the parties want to play - compare the negotiations with the Chinese over Cheng Lei (result) and Wang Hengjun (no result yet). No in these sort of diplomatic discussions does not mean never.

I must have missed that?
Mentioned in this article alng with who made the call in the senate not to extend.
 
Because it’s pointless point scoring exercise. A waste of everyone’s time and money.
I'm sick and tired of business people, politicians etc simply being able to walk away and leave their pile of 💩 to fix up, knowing all the while that what they were doing was potentially illegal and morally wrong. Let alone in this case get a massive bonus. So while nothing may come of it, of course it won't, surely we all deserve to see a real squirm. Life made difficult for a while. Accountability. Seems to have disappeared from life.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sick and tired of business people, politicians etc simply being able to walk away and leave their pile of 💩 to fix up, knowing all the while that what they were doing was potentially illegal and morally wrong. Let alone in this case get a massive bonus. So while nothing may come of it, of course it won't, surely we all deserve to see a real squirm. Life made difficult for a while.
Well, you might see some squirm, but most want blood. They won't get it.

Like when a prosecuter says it's not worth the suit because a conviction isn't likely. Putting AJ on the stand (even with the threat of contempt), listening to whatever coughfooting he'll proffer up will give no one satisfaction unless he ends up in prison, blackballed from holding an executive position at any company, or dies. None of those are likely.

It's not fair, but we live in a capitalist society, hardly a moral one.
 
EXCLUSIVE OFFER - Offer expires: 20 Jan 2025

- Earn up to 200,000 bonus Velocity Points*
- Enjoy unlimited complimentary access to Priority Pass lounges worldwide
- Earn up to 3 Citi reward Points per dollar uncapped

*Terms And Conditions Apply

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Well, you might see some squirm, but most want blood. They won't get it.

Like when a prosecuter says it's not worth the suit because a conviction isn't likely. Putting AJ on the stand (even with the threat of contempt), listening to whatever coughfooting he'll proffer up will give no one satisfaction unless he ends up in prison, blackballed from holding an executive position at any company, or dies. None of those are likely.

It's not fair, but we live in a capitalist society, hardly a moral one.
And by this example, it is tantamount to accepting it's ok to do this. That isn't capItalism. He didn't even have to face the AGM and nor will Goyder.
 
Goyder has not yet departed. For now, he is still Qantas Chairman and will have to appear at the 3 Nov 2023 AGM
... and so will have control of the questioning from the floor and also be able to defend his and AJ’s legacy. He'll have the final word on everything.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top