Why I bother is beyond me... however...
1/ Medhead - alcohol is halal for Penegal also - I think you know this;
2/ Enough with the fanbois bullsh$t around here eh.....
Some of you love EK (or QF or Pauline Hanson for that matter) like it's the proverbial best-thing-since-sliced-bread.
You having wet dreams over EK doesn't invalidate someone else's dislike of the same airline (or whatever the issue is).
3/ Back to the OP.....
Here's where I'll support you - you are perfectly entitled to not like EK or whoever, and for whatever reasons - however you have stated some specific "broken promises" issues, and as someone who strongly believes in customer service and the importance of brand promises - let's take a look at these:
1 55% decrease in checked baggage allowance: was 4 x 32 kg, now 60 kg (J & WP)
2 loss of common-rated destinations when travelling via LHR (yes I know some do not like LHR but I need to stop in London so this is real downside to me)
3 loss of BA JSA
4 no premium economy on EK
5 loss of QFi metal from PER, ADL, BNE etc
6 loss of stopover in HKG, SIN, BKK w onward flights direct to Europe using QFi or QF codeshare
7 massive loss of SC & FF points when flying partner airlines (& loss of codeshare on these flights)
(some might argue that 6 & & 7 are not EK-QF partnership issues but the loss of the BA JSA, the CX codeshare etc followed on from this)
8 no pork (e.g. bacon) on QF1, 2, 9, 10 (a cooked breakfast without bacon???)
9 no alcohol in the food (so how can it be called a trifle?)
10 progressive winding back of QFF earning on EK flights
11 increase in prices (there were some great deals immediately after the tie up but these are just a distant memory)
12 CD: great if flying Aus-LHR but we were promised progressive roll out on all long haul routes.
13 loss of QFi to FRA
1 - Nobody likes a decrease in baggage allowance - however, in the last 17 years or so, I've lost track of how many times QF chops and changes its baggage allowances. IIRC - a few years ago - the allowance (even under the BA JSA) wasn't that generous. It was only the USA that was particularly generous due to the piece system. Since then, it has increased, and decreased, much like my blood pressure when JQ flights appear on my search screen...
2 - I'm not really sure what you mean here..??..?? I assume you mean that you used to like flying to LHR, having a free stopover and then flying to Europe somewhere..?? And now - you don't get a free LHR stopover?? Is that the issue? Either way - I'm not sure that this is a broken promise, in any further way than the flights stop in DXB rather than SIN...
3 - And now there is an EK JSA. Is your comment an academic research finding? Because I don't think AJ, in announcing the EK JSA, ever promised that the BA JSA would continue..??
4 - Fair enough - But many folks didn't care for World Traveller Plus either.... Personally I find PE a waste of space.... not worth the price premium for the little extra it delivers, but that's just MHO...
5 - No one likes being ignored - try being Jetstarised (seriously - probably would have happened regardless of EK tie-up)
6 - Rationalisation of the network was likely even if the BA JSA and SIN stop had continued. Personally - I like BA more than EK, and I liked SIN instead of DXB. But that's just MHO and I'm free to fly QF to LHR (as I've done), or choose to fly BA or others if I wish to avoid DXB.
7 - Simpler and Fairer has nothing to do with the EK JSA. You are correct in that regard. You're conflating general QF issues (route enhancements, simpler & fairer etc) with the EK related tie-up. We may as well include JQ being given the 787s first and 'small plates' on your list of grievances.
8 - Are you F$%^##^ serious??!! Are you just trying to get a rise out of people?? If you can't have an airplane breakfast without bacon - you've got issues.... And you should probably go and see your cardiologist. I hate to break it to you - but MANY airline breakfasts don't have bacon, or pork, or deep fried hash browns, or fruit loops, or Nutella-infused Belgian waffles (dammit, now you've made me hungry). I actually get really upset when QF doesn't serve In-N-Out onboard.
By all means - complain about the food choices - especially all the pony-tailed-inspired-new-age-cough that barely passes as a meal - but supposedly kale is a food group
But I don't think this is a legitimate gripe at all. The UA flight I just took the other day had sausages and pancakes for breakfast or a cold muesli thingy. For the record, the sausage was apparently 'chicken' (you know what else 'tastes-like-chicken'...)
9 - Airlines actually serve alcohol-infused trifle?? Seriously?? I thought that was just my grandmother.... Please let me know which airlines do this?
10 - THIS!! THIS is a totally legitimate issue - earning, lounge access etc are definitely legitimate issues to highlight as benefit reductions that have occurred post-alliance. I'm with you on this.
11 - Welcome to the world of airline economics...... If people don't fly them - their prices will drop..... Or they'll downgauge fleet capacity to compensate
Hardly a broken promise....
12 - Yes - another legitimate gripe, and benefit windback. I'm with you on this...
13 - See earlier point on route rationalisation.
OVERALL - You've conflated way too many issues/preferences into your list of "broken promises" - there really are only a few on your list that qualify as broken promises or benefit "enhancements" and by all means - shout those from the rooftops.
I think some of your other issues are plain ridiculous, and demean the bigger point you were trying to make.
And I'm no EK fanboi - in fact I don't like any of the sandbox airlines.
Most folks here have a Do Not Fly list... I don't.
I have a Fly List - and it's a fairly small list.
We each have our reasons to fly or not fly various airlines - which could include catering preferences, safety record and culture, nationalism, price, cabin comfort/décor, lavatory cleanliness, fellow-pax-cleanliness, and of course aircraft selection, amongst other reasons.
I support everyone's choices as to who they like or dislike.
And I'm a big opponent of enhancements - and generally not a fan of the EK JSA.
But I find it very difficult to support your arguments in this thread.
I would suggest revisiting your OP - taking out the BS, and reposting with only the REAL reductions in concrete published benefits that have occurred since the switchover.
And although I prefer SIN as a stop rather than DXB - I don't think that issue qualifies for the list.