And that in itself shows how garbage this "research" is.
QF is the dominant player in this market and thus is subject to most of the media coverage - like BA in the UK, AA/UA in the US, NZ in NZ. Wouldn't surprise me if 80% of the respondents don't even hold a passport.
QF stories get clicks - yet when there's similar issues on other airlines, it goes unreported. QF travel credits? No mention of VA travel credits (that are still set to expire this year). QF chairmans lounge? Most people don't even know VA have an equivalent that MPs are also members of (Beyond). QF cancelled 10% of SYD-CBR? Absolutely no mention that VA cancelled 10.5% of the much higher density & more frequent route SYD-MEL; and their OTP is now 59%.
Absolutely nothing but crickets in the media about it.
It's like politics, some people can't fathom how others vote for the other side, yet they do. People still seem to be flying QF. I'd welcome it if others swore of flying QF and leave the cheaper fares and award seats to others, but I don't see it happening.