RSA MEL F Lounge Qantas Official Response (Refused Drinks)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Based on several recent threads that exceeded 100+ posts, QF seems hell bent on generating negative publicity over the last 6 months. Each time it seems to be loyal customers that suffer. Poor form, and commercially just plain dumb.
 
If as a woman I am only allowed 1 drink per hour then how the heck am I going to be able to try the Bellini, Moet, and Taittinger next Friday morning for a 10am flight? :eek: I know, set the alarm for 4 am!
Thats three drinks, 90 minutes should be fine :p

Aside from the official response is there any evidence (experience) of this being anything other than an isolated incident due to a overly zealous staff member? Is this policy being routinely enforced?

Isolated? It's happened more than once.
 
I can confirm that this has happened previously in the SYD F Lounge to a table of 4 of us.

Short pours, incredibly long times between refills and then a mysterious tray of coffees that when we pointed out we didn't order "perhaps you should have them anyway". I kid you not.
 
I can confirm that this has happened previously in the SYD F Lounge to a table of 4 of us.

Short pours, incredibly long times between refills and then a mysterious tray of coffees that when we pointed out we didn't order "perhaps you should have them anyway". I kid you not.

That would impress me even less; I don't drink coffee. :shock:
 
I can confirm that this has happened previously in the SYD F Lounge to a table of 4 of us.

Short pours, incredibly long times between refills and then a mysterious tray of coffees that when we pointed out we didn't order "perhaps you should have them anyway". I kid you not.

wow. subtle.... amazing!
 
You have got to be kidding. If reinstating Jeremy Clarkson can get 500k + signatures, maybe us AFF's should start a "improve Qantas" petition. I love my national airline, but you seriously have to wonder.....

I can confirm that this has happened previously in the SYD F Lounge to a table of 4 of us.

Short pours, incredibly long times between refills and then a mysterious tray of coffees that when we pointed out we didn't order "perhaps you should have them anyway". I kid you not.
 
Yes. The small pours have been going on for a while. IME after the Sofitel take over the service improved for a while then it went down hill
image.jpg
8am V LGD glass at another lounge... With an espresso chaser!

was filled even higher
apologies as had to sip before photo
apologies for side view as well
 
Eeyore Flounge.jpg
This was a "full" pour on Friday, and the first of the day too....
 
This was a "full" pour on Friday, and the first of the day too....

Matches my most recent experiences. And the pinot pours were only just up to the little "bump" in the glass. Definitely less than 100mL. Maybe it's not RSA rules they're enforcing, but LAG? :)
 
Australia's highest-earning Velocity Frequent Flyer credit card: Offer expires: 21 Jan 2025
- Earn 60,000 bonus Velocity Points
- Get unlimited Virgin Australia Lounge access
- Enjoy a complimentary return Virgin Australia domestic flight each year

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Sexist much?! I hold my alcohol a lot better than many men and would not (was not) be impressed being told I was limited to one per hour. Pretty sure it's two in the first hour for women too.


Sexist? maybe but this is whats been promoted for atleast the past 5-7 years that I can remember.
Males - 2 drinks first hour 1 drink each hour after
Females - 1 drink first hour 1 drink each hour after
https://www.racv.com.au/wps/wcm/con...o+get+to+.05+blood+alcohol+concentration+(bac)
 
Sexist? maybe but this is whats been promoted for atleast the past 5-7 years that I can remember.
Males - 2 drinks first hour 1 drink each hour after
Females - 1 drink first hour 1 drink each hour after
https://www.racv.com.au/wps/wcm/con...o+get+to+.05+blood+alcohol+concentration+(bac)

But this is safe limits regarding being below the drink driving limit.
I agree it's not sexist but I cannot fathom how it's QF's responsibility to ensure that I can drive a car after being in the F Lounge. In fact I cannot see how it's any licensed premises responsibility to ensure this.
It's mine and mine alone.
 
But this is safe limits regarding being below the drink driving limit.
I agree it's not sexist but I cannot fathom how it's QF's responsibility to ensure that I can drive a car after being in the F Lounge. In fact I cannot see how it's any licensed premises responsibility to ensure this.
It's mine and mine alone.

I never said it was, and even mentioned that in my ealier post, was just responding to blackcats comment to do with legal driving, not RSA which I agree are compleatly seperate. but this was the "RSA Guidelines" (which they are not) QF was enforcing that was given by the 3 drinks in 90 minsand then being cut off
 
But this is safe limits regarding being below the drink driving limit.
I agree it's not sexist but I cannot fathom how it's QF's responsibility to ensure that I can drive a car after being in the F Lounge. In fact I cannot see how it's any licensed premises responsibility to ensure this.
It's mine and mine alone.

But is is assuming all women handle their alcohol the same, and at a lesser ability than men.
 
Clearly the ladies should be limited to a single shandy. Maybe they can also bring a plate to cut down on catering costs as well.

Not everyday - but I don't think a glass of champagne before the meal, a red with the meal and a glass of the Noble One to conclude proceedings would put many people into a state where they would be a risk to themselves or people around them.
 
I cannot fathom how it's QF's responsibility to ensure that I can drive a car after being in the F Lounge.
Given that realistically this scenario can only occur if you are on a JQ flight (no other flights short enough for it to be an issue), perhaps this is the logic behind it. However, if so, it would be nice if QF could just be upfront and state it.
 
Given that realistically this scenario can only occur if you are on a JQ flight (no other flights short enough for it to be an issue), perhaps this is the logic behind it. However, if so, it would be nice if QF could just be upfront and state it.

Given most of us are smart enough to organise transport at the other end, it really isnt QFs business. RSA is not legal driving BAC. Maybe someone needs to point this out to them.
 
RSA MEL F Lounge Qantas Official Response ( Refused Drinks)

I can confirm that this has happened previously in the SYD F Lounge to a table of 4 of us.

Short pours, incredibly long times between refills and then a mysterious tray of coffees that when we pointed out we didn't order "perhaps you should have them anyway". I kid you not.

That is just rude.

View attachment 43435
This was a "full" pour on Friday, and the first of the day too....

Eyeore dun it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top