Showing R rated movie on QF59

tomlee1986

Established Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Posts
1,666
Qantas
Bronze
Virgin
Red
but it was super uncomfortable for everyone, especially with families and kids on-board.
Sure Sure. Everyone minus the outraged normals who race to the internet to post the outrage.

The world is always outraged about something. It’s Kmart one minute, Qantas the next.
 
"It featured graphic nudity and a lot of sexting – the kind where you could literally read the texts on screen without needing headphones."

As opposed to the type of sexting requiring headphones so as to be able to read the texts on screen...? 🤔

Also, this quote from the article...
As a result, Qantas said staff asked passengers what movie they would like to watch, resulting in the movie Daddio (2023) being played to everyone on the flight.
So... they're suggesting that Qantas flight crew didn't unilaterally select an inappropriate movie. Rather, they asked passengers what they wanted to watch and said passengers selected Daddio. I smell a beat up.
 
Pretty poor judgement by someone in the crew.
Albeit I'm surprised the words survived the normal pretty conservative editing process.
 
Although the R rating is the US, not Australia, which equates to a MA rating here.

I don’t actually think they have R rated movies in the IFE and if they did, I would think they are edited down (many true R rated films have a tamer version for certain markets that won’t permit the content. Even Australia FTA stations often use the lower classification versions).
 
Although the R rating is the US, not Australia, which equates to a MA rating here.

I don’t actually think they have R rated movies in the IFE and if they did, I would think they are edited down (many true R rated films have a tamer version for certain markets that won’t permit the content. Even Australia FTA stations often use the lower classification versions).
Yeah. I'd never heard of the movie, but looking it up it is rated MA in Australia.
 
Although the R rating is the US, not Australia, which equates to a MA rating here.

I don’t actually think they have R rated movies in the IFE and if they did, I would think they are edited down (many true R rated films have a tamer version for certain markets that won’t permit the content. Even Australia FTA stations often use the lower classification versions).
This is according to IMDB: Rated R for language throughout, sexual material and brief graphic nudity.

 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Yeah. I'd never heard of the movie, but looking it up it is rated MA in Australia.
this is from Sydney film festival last year: Unclassified 18+

 
This is according to IMDB: Rated R for language throughout, sexual material and brief graphic nudity.


That’s a US rating. Consistent with MA here from the description.

NC-17 is the US equivalent of Australian R. It’s very rare.

this is from Sydney film festival last year: Unclassified 18+


That just means it didn’t get a rating for the film festival.
 
this is from Sydney film festival last year: Unclassified 18+

This is from the the classifications Australia which would be the official classification here.
 
Classification is a red herring. The films content just wasn't suitable to be shown on all screens on the flight, with no option to turn it off (that sounds odd). The crew obviously didn't know what the pax had 'voted' for (or you'd hope they didn't know).

After a while it was taken off and another film shown. From the report:

Qantas confirmed that when it became clear the movie was not appropriate for all ages, the crew attempted to fix the screens for customers who did not want to watch it.

However, when they realised this was not possible, the film was changed to a children’s movie instead.

A er, mistake (for want of a better expression :cool:) but poor judgement by the crew, it seems.
 
with no option to turn it off (that sounds odd).
Agree, this doesn't sound quite right. And even if it was, you can't tell me there was no way to put something over the screen (i.e. in the event that a parent wished to prevent their child from watching the screen in front of them).
 
Classification is a red herring.

Not really. The OP article said it was X rated (ie, literal cough). There’s a whopping difference between showing that to children vs an MA film.

Obviously neither are cool but if it was the former I’d say QF would be in a world of hurt. Of course that didn’t happen because that would be ridiculous.
 
Not really. The OP article said it was X rated (ie, literal cough). There’s a whopping difference between showing that to children vs an MA film.

Obviously neither are cool but if it was the former I’d say QF would be in a world of hurt. Of course that didn’t happen because that would be ridiculous.
I mean... realistically it sounds like the passengers were simply shown the modern-day equivalent (by today's standards, at least) of the old midday FTA tele-movie.

Sarcasm aside, I'd love to know how many passengers spoke up about the unsuitability of the film. Leaving it run for an hour before switching film choice sounds a bit unlikely (unless it took that long for people to decide that the film was too racy for general viewing).
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and enjoy a better viewing experience, as well as full participation on our community forums.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to enjoy lots of other benefits and discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top