To be somewhat fair at QF, what
could have they done to improve the JL?
Firstly, some rough qualification and observation will find that the JL does get relatively crowded; perhaps not as much as the QP but complaints have been raised here and on FT. Quite odd when it should only have WPs (no anytime access) and J tickets (and their guests), but there you go.
I was thinking that there would be better food, either the quality of the offering and/or a mini-restaurant style (a la F Lounge). The latter would be an expensive exercise indeed, and would be insane for the faster pace of domestic flights (compared to international where things can proceed a bit slower). It would also be out of line with the International J Lounges (i.e. the "international QP"), although IMHO calling the "international QPs" as international J lounges is rather misleading.
The former of the above suggestions might not have been too difficult for QF to actually achieve, but some may view it as a corny suggestion anyway. Actually there is some different food on offer at times in the JL which is of reasonable quality and not offered at the QP (e.g. hot pastry items, quiches and pies at the SYD T3 JL vs. the QP). Having said that:
- The type of food (fried or baked stuffs) may not appeal as quality and hence is not a real contributor to an improved service over the QP
- The food disappears quickly anyway (but that applies to every QP where hot food is served)
I wouldn't mind if they actually had a human barista there who could make a good coffee, including soy and flavoured coffees. (Yes there are machines, but a good cup of coffee is an art, not a science.)
Apart from that, not sure what other kind of food that could be served buffet style would be appropriate. Unless the JL was set up like a Sizzlers (*shudder*)...
I don't think the JL could really improve on alcohol offerings over the QP. Adding a couple more types of beer to the range isn't going to be spectacular.
The JLs look somewhat better than the QPs, but unless you're
QF009 I think the decor has little impact (certainly the difference in the decor between a JL and QP would be almost unnoticeable to the commoner). The chairs are certainly not much more comfortable in the JL compared to the QP.
One mistake is that the JLs in SYD T3 and BNE are not walled off, so the noise carries through either lounge. Not a good idea.
The showers (and associated facilities and amenities) are on par with QP, so perhaps a better offering here might be warranted. (I wonder how many people would then like the JL just to swipe some good quality amenities.)
So, anyone have any other ideas as to how the JL could have been improved? Or should they have just canned the whole idea?