Superannuation Discussion + market volatility

Respectfully disagree.

You can be a self-fundee retiree for 30+ years, enjoy the health services, security and infrastructure etc of the state for really very little tax.

The money invested in super is taxed concessionally. The growth (which is a result of your investments not toil) is taxed favourably in accumulation and not at all in pension mode

You may have paid your taxes while you were working but the deal for most self-funded retirees is very generous in Australia.
Yep!

There is this misconception that there’s some sort of “Death duties” on super but it’s just the ATO coming after those concessions that aren’t rightfully bestowed upon the living.

TBH, when I’m gone it’s not my problem but if I had for warning, I’d just take a chunk out of super tax free and that would pass through my estate tax free. Simples.
 
Yep!

There is this misconception that there’s some sort of “Death duties” on super but it’s just the ATO coming after those concessions that aren’t rightfully bestowed upon the living.

TBH, when I’m gone it’s not my problem but if I had for warning, I’d just take a chunk out of super tax free and that would pass through my estate tax free. Simples.
As it currently stand.... based on current tax law....... of course it could all be different by the time you die! The recent changes to inheritance tax in the UK are a great example of that.
 
Yep!

There is this misconception that there’s some sort of “Death duties” on super but it’s just the ATO coming after those concessions that aren’t rightfully bestowed upon the living.

TBH, when I’m gone it’s not my problem but if I had for warning, I’d just take a chunk out of super tax free and that would pass through my estate tax free. Simples.
And as that article said that's what could happen with planning but sometimes we don't get the chance to do that.
 
TBH, when I’m gone it’s not my problem but if I had for warning, I’d just take a chunk out of super tax free and that would pass through my estate tax free. Simples.
Or have an ACD with a POA.
But... what if those chest pains were just heartburn!
 
My understanding is that concessional contributions + growth is classified as non-taxable. Its only non-concessional contributions (i.e money that has already been taxed at marginal rates) that is classified as non-taxable

What am I not getting here?

recent changes to inheritance tax in the UK are a great example of that.
Jeremy is not happy
 
A trust structure neatly moves the goal posts.
The beneficiaries choose when to draw down and what tax will be paid
Quite good for families etc but not worth the effort for those without immediate family.
 
I have several super accounts, 1 DBS and 2 income streams (IS). The second IS account was created to receive funds from the first IS. The first account with say 700k, is now $150k. The rest has been withdrawn over a number of years, and then become non-concessional or after tax contributions to the second IS. My Taxed vs Non-taxed components have shifted from 60:40 to 90:10. So at this point only 10% of my super will be taxed if passing to non-dependents.

Now as has been discussed, you can't just roll money into an existing IS. So the transfer and contribution caps come into play, and each withdrawal is allocated proportionally on taxed/untaxed, so the "washing" as someone put it is progressive over time. At one stage the bring forward rules allowed me to pull out $300k in one year, but this was three years worth so the next transfer awaits expiry of that period. So after 30/6/24 I can pull out non-concessional contributions up to the cap of $120,000. I will then finish up with a very small account of around $30k that has a taxable component, and an account of about $700k that is fully taxed. Then it all stops at age 75.

Now this is as it has been explained to me, I am not an expert, and I have to say making BPAY payments to the fund of up to $300k was an interesting experience.
 
I have several super accounts, 1 DBS and 2 income streams (IS). The second IS account was created to receive funds from the first IS. The first account with say 700k, is now $150k. The rest has been withdrawn over a number of years, and then become non-concessional or after tax contributions to the second IS. My Taxed vs Non-taxed components have shifted from 60:40 to 90:10. So at this point only 10% of my super will be taxed if passing to non-dependents.

Now as has been discussed, you can't just roll money into an existing IS. So the transfer and contribution caps come into play, and each withdrawal is allocated proportionally on taxed/untaxed, so the "washing" as someone put it is progressive over time. At one stage the bring forward rules allowed me to pull out $300k in one year, but this was three years worth so the next transfer awaits expiry of that period. So after 30/6/24 I can pull out non-concessional contributions up to the cap of $120,000. I will then finish up with a very small account of around $30k that has a taxable component, and an account of about $700k that is fully taxed. Then it all stops at age 75.

Now this is as it has been explained to me, I am not an expert, and I have to say making BPAY payments to the fund of up to $300k was an interesting experience.
$300k in EFTPOS cards with cc earn? :0
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top