whatmeworry
Established Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Posts
- 4,623
What you clearly fail to approximate is that wet transmission even if inhaled is actually exchange of body fluids. It is well known that the virus lives in bodily fluids, so that someone inhaling, ingesting or injecting those bodily fluids have a very good chance to get infection.
On the other hand, a bodily fluid that lands on a surface and then dries in which the virus remains alive is vastly more difficult. Inhalation of dried, resuspended bodily fluid is very different to breathing in someone's sneeze. If the virus lived in that dried material a much greater risk is created.
You might see this as pedantics, but that is the strict definition. This is much better than just making something up that is out of step with the rest of the world. For a start your way means we can't even determine the appropriate PPE required.
Technically a virus when not in a host is not alive. It is more of a case of whether the virus can be reactivated once dried.
Reminds me of my old Biology teacher telling us one reason why spitting in public is an offence in most places. For example a person that has Tuberculosis, if they spat in public, their spit would dry up and once dry could be picked up by the wind. The dried up spit could inhaled by another person(s).
I wonder if their is anything in journals regarding Ebola's viability outside the host.