Not that it relevant to the US election in my view, but President Trump has been nominated. This second time is for next year's award. Same guy nominated last time a couple of years back. Nominations can be by anyone apparently.
Not that it relevant to the US election in my view, but President Trump has been nominated. This second time is for next year's award. Same guy nominated last time a couple of years back. Nominations can be by anyone apparently.
President Trump says about President's Obama's peace prize
“He had no idea why he got it and you know what, that was the only thing I agreed with him on,” Trump said.
President Obama received his Nobel prize eight months into his presidency for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”
I kind of agree with President Trump re: President Obama's peace award ....lol
President Obama received his Nobel prize eight months into his presidency for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”
What? Where’s the wine?30+ people dead in bushfires, but the trump empathetic contribution is that it will get cold again and “science doesn’t know”.
OK then.
This may be a tad OT:
Just in case he and some others are wrong, I’ll be preparing my home emergency kit as usual. The radio will be tuned to the ABC so that I will know whether to stay or leave, and I will not be on my a*se watching Skye coughpy news.
View attachment 227466
On top of all that Trump was saying the same thing a year ago.
Trump Administration Seeking To Overhaul Forest Management Rules
The U.S. Forest Service is proposing changes to a landmark environmental law that would allow it to fast-track some forest management projects, including logging and prescribed burning.www.npr.org
<snip>
The people who have a deep hatred for Trump will vote for Biden for the sake of it, but I'm yet to hear anyone make a convincing argument that Biden is an attractive candidate in and of himself. I'm not sure you can win purely on an anti-the-other-person platform.
“Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in our 175-year history — until now. The 2020 election is literally a matter of life and death. We urge you to vote for health, science and Joe Biden for President. — Scientific American |
The problem is once again science is losing out to ideology.Fire scientists int the main say that fuel load is the most important factor in the severity of wild fires.
Now Climate Change may increase the chances of a fire starting and certainly is increasing the growth rate of trees etc so adding to the fuel load.So the solution is to deal with the fuel load.
Forests That Survive Megafires Prove Good Management Trumps Climate Change
Politics, ideology, and bad management are the real existential threats to California's forests.www.forbes.com
However there is another reason for many of the fires this year on the USA West Coast.
ANTIFA admit to “igniting fires” all over the country to draw attention to ‘Climate Change’
In related news, Antifa Radical was Arrested For Arson In Washington State — Was Caught On Highway Live-Streaming On Facebook Before Arrest (Video) Further, Antifa protesters set fires in Seattle: …abruptearthchanges.com
On top of all that Trump was saying the same thing a year ago.
Trump Administration Seeking To Overhaul Forest Management Rules
The U.S. Forest Service is proposing changes to a landmark environmental law that would allow it to fast-track some forest management projects, including logging and prescribed burning.www.npr.org
30+ people dead in bushfires, but the trump empathetic contribution is that it will get cold again and “science doesn’t know”.
OK then.
This may be a tad OT:
Just in case he and some others are wrong, I’ll be preparing my home emergency kit as usual. The radio will be tuned to the ABC so that I will know whether to stay or leave, and I will not be on my a*se watching Skye coughpy news.
View attachment 227466
I don't understand (was this a memo to self? )May I suggest a thread on climate change, or not or whatever you wish to call it. Then all of this stuff that came up last summer can go in that thread.
I don't understand (was this a memo to self? )
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Ah, strike a match but hope it wont catch on fireWell I guess I was hoping to avoid the multiple references and paragraphs supporting climate change links that prove a point or not rather than the one sentence that I posted. I still feel we need a climate change / not, because it pops up in everything.
Ah, strike a match but hope it wont catch on fire