I travel PER-HKG 3-4 times a year and have to say, I'm pretty much over the SIN stopover. Also I seem to struggle to get decent flights in/out of SIN, and usually end up on the 1am out and 5am in flights ... its fine for a few trips, but I'm getting close to my limit I think. All this not helped I guess by the pretty old interiors on SQ ex PER either.
So, initial excitement at the prospect of burning bazillions of points on J upgrades via VA ... but I'm not going to travel to SYD or BNE first ... and if there is much prospect of losing the transcon 330's ... well ... its going to end up pretty much being all bad for me.
So people are saying it seems unlikely VA would fly a 330 out of PER to go direct to HKG ... I reckon they'd do ok, even if only a few times a week rather than a flight a day. Its been ages since I've taken SQ out of PER without the flight being chockers ... now, of course, stopping in SIN I don't know where those passengers end points are, but there is no doubt about the numbers going to asia from PER in general.
Oh, by the by, had the opportunity to remind myself of how unimpressive SQ 380's are in Y as I did this SIN-HKG last week. 10 across down the back ... yuck.
Two things can happen now (or very soon from now).
Firstly, the [?] can be removed from the thread title. Secondly, those how posted in this thread that 'VA will never fly to HKG' can now admit how 'uninformed' they were/still are.
As I posted previously, this will be one less A330 in the domestic system for transcons which will be a negative for me unfortunately.
looking at the routes available it looks like only transit on HX is possible via HKG? I can't seem to see any HU flights ex HKG
....Mid 2017 is just 4 months away ... I don't see that occurring unless they are willing to have low load factors for a little while as international trips do get purchased further out than domestically.
Yes, lead time is required, but a travel agent I know claims that in the past couple of years for leisure trips to southeast Asia (and presumably HKG) the number of travellers booking within two months or six weeks of departure has increased as a percentage of all bookings, a trend the airlines do not like as it results in less certainty for them
VA must be wary of announcing the 'flights subject to government approval' clause with a claimed commencement date given its recent disastrous experience with TT between Oz and DPS. That situation must have cost (and be costing) millions of dollars.
Nonetheless, great to see VAi expanding as this can only be good for travellers, including those who collect Velocity points.
Does VA have the capacity to operate both? Not sure how many slots are left for a HKG-based airline to fly to AU major cities, but I guess the two airlines could take one route each and codeshare with each other.Its looking like a July launch, subject to change of course. MEL-HKG definitely being talked about, however possibly SYD too as HNA wants both cities connected to HKG.
Its looking like a July launch, subject to change of course. MEL-HKG definitely being talked about, however possibly SYD too as HNA wants both cities connected to HKG.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I know a few guys here are not very happy about losing an A330 on the transcon routes. Just curious, how important is it for VA to compete against QF on the transcon service with the A330? Are these flights generally full (especially in J)? How important are these routes in terms of revenue and profit?
The 744 and the A380 are both quite good economy products even with 10 across. Much better than the economy products on the 777, 787, A330, A340 and A350.The best way to be impressed by the A380 in economy is step straight off an EK 77W with it's 3-4-3 configuration onto the A380 with same configuration. Much more comfortable! One day they will no doubt ruin it with a 3-5-3 configuration.
The 744 and the A380 are both quite good economy products even with 10 across. Much better than the economy products on the 777, 787, A330, A340 and A350.