I am more impressed Wozza didnt like Hannah's Swing and rated 92 and enjoyed the CW Ferguson at 93 points!
Agree taste is personal, which is one reason why this forum is enjoyable!
Well spotted,
RRV!
On the commute home yesterday evening, I actually thought I had been a bit harsh, so bumped the
Swing up to a Wozza 93! And funny you should mention the
CW Ferguson. Because I bumped up the Swing to the same score as the CW Ferguson as I thought they were comparable quality wines (obviously noting they have their differences and strengths and weaknesses).
On the does Wozza
like it or
not like it front. I have two pet hates that will put a wine in the
do not like it camp. The worst is high alcohol content. The other is the over use of oak, especially in Reds and in particular if a sweet vanilla taste dominates the fruit. I'm getting too old for hangovers, so really don't like wines much higher than 14% ABV. For the oak, I have never been a fan of the commercial tasting Red (the pubs and High Street are full of them). I prefer the oak to support not lead the taste party. That said, I have come to appreciate stronger oak influences will be there with the bigger wines that are built to be drunk after some cellaring.
Looks like I missed a crucial trick in not decanting the Swing. Moral of the story: listen to
DBs tasting notes over mine! He's more considerate to the wine and more discerning with his notes. DB was super impressive at the January wine dinner in Sydney. He's got a great nose for his wines. And, you can meet DB and me if you intend to come to the Cabernet wine dinner in Sydney in May!!
And I totally agree with you, RRV. I really like to hear the personal opinions of others, and love the fact people share different opinions on this forum. The forum is much richer and the better for it. Long may it continue ...