travel_bug
Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2020
- Posts
- 171
- Virgin
- Platinum
Reference to the Canberra coat of arms which features two swans, one black and one white.Black Swans were in WA wern't they?
Reference to the Canberra coat of arms which features two swans, one black and one white.Black Swans were in WA wern't they?
u should be running an airlinePretty sure the gov would have done a few sums on the back of a drink coaster and cogitated over the cost benefits to their bottom line:
- already paying all VA staff the job keeper for six months
- already cut a few costs/taxes
- already subsidised several flights
- even it doesn't fail ,the airline (as will all airlines everywhere) will be significantly smaller for 18-24 months and thus x% of staff will be sacked anyway and be on job seeker - the whole sector is going to contract
- QF will also be dropping staff in 6 months because they are going to be smaller - additional job seeker costs
- what are the likelihood of the company surviving with just a loan in its current form and would it be competitive in the foreseeable economic turmoil
- whats the likelihood of getting their money back
- are they just delaying the inevitable for 6-9 months
- if the company gets restructured how many staff will lose their job and would it be any different to those who will lose their job anyway due to economic turmoil
- they currently have run at a loss for years and paid no tax, if it's restructured could it make a profit
- will they be a better competitor if it restructured rather than bailed out to limp along
- if they support VA and then that causes QF to totter and need help, how much will that cost
- if they interfere what will be the fallout with other industries demanding special treatment
- if they interfere what will be the fallout to their conservative/right wing
- if they do/don't act what will be the current overall public sentiment (not just VA supporters) and how long will that last
Pretty sure the gov would have done a few sums on the back of a drink coaste
The owners aren't in a position to "do squat now" due to worldwide lockdowns.
And there wasn't a need for them to "do squat before" as there was no issue with continuing operations - Virgin even got sizeable funding just a few months. So there wouldn't be an issue except for the government restrictions. Hence they're the appropriate party to resolve this.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
What’s that old defamation defence, “You can’t sue if it’s true”?So, its confirmed: Paul Scurrah = fake news?
AJ just moved a few notches up the credibility scale in my books
View attachment 215619
View attachment 215620
If the owners want to keep THEIR business viable the THEY can stump up the cash required. I'm sick of multi-nationals and, for that matter, Australian businesses, going bust and expecting the tax payer to bail them out.
Branson will come to the party in some shape or form. My thinking is more about stopping Branson from talking for a bit. The lower profile the better and the media is also getting his efforts to save VS mixed up with our story in Australia.
Or just Velocity AirwaysHow about a name change to Velocity Australia to cut out the Virgin name royalty?
PS speaks very well and I know it’s only one side of the story but hearing that tonight gives me plenty of confidence he can steer them on the right track.
Let me walk you though it as you pay income tax.
Now that VA is in administration, if it doesnt make it out the other side there will be obligations on the government to pay for liabilities to the VA employees. These are backed by the government through the Fair Entitlements Guarantee Scheme. (link) After this time the VA employees will be on Jobseeker (the dole) until such time as they find another job, which might be a long time. The FEGS liability has been estimated at $800 million.
In this context government assistance becomes more likely in some form (and probably to QF now that the administration of VA has dealt with the foreign shareholders). It's probably cheaper than paying for the entitlments and unemployment benefits. Thats before we consider the downstream impacts on the tourism industry etc.
You stated you were a taxpayer, so now it's the governments role to minimise their costs in dealing with this mess and providing assistance may be cheaper than letting VA go into liquidation. It also provides political cover to provide assistance to QF as such assistance will be on a sector basis.
Well the stay on payment of royalties seems to be the only help he's provided in this period outside of "thoughts and prayers" and passive aggressive notes about lack of government loans and how he knows he lives in a tax haven but he promises that he's not there just to avoid tax
quick edit: I know he's said that he's pumped millions into saving jobs through Virgin Group, but I don't know how much of that actually went to VA given Virgin Group's minority stake, unlike its stake in Virgin Atlantic.
To those obsessed with saving $15m per year paying Richard for the Virgin name how about some really rough math to get over it?
Google estimates repainting a 737 costs between US$100,000 to US$200,000.
So how about we call it AUD $200,000 per 737 x 130 planes = $26m .... just for the planes. Then lounges, terminals, gate signage, boarding passes, business class napkins and salt and pepper shakers.
If all of the stories about recapitalisation of VA are true, AJ has a lot to be worried about, in particular the international operations. Even if they're not true and VA folds, the ACCC will be all over him.