justinbrett
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Posts
- 9,866
- Qantas
- Platinum
- Oneworld
- Emerald
- Star Alliance
- Gold
Virgin Australia might have some foreign owners but think about:
Where are the staff employed? Mostly Australia.
Routes flown? Mostly within Australia with some Pacific and a few long haul.
If profitable in the future, where are company taxes paid. To Australia.
Where is payroll tax paid? Australia.
Where is the income tax paid for most of its employees? Australia
Where are most of its subcontractors, and their staff and other business partners based and operating? Australia.
Airport owners? Mostly Australian companies (although I doubt the government is super concerned about them).
Aeronautical and security charges charges? To the Australian government.
Who benefits from competitive airfares? Australian people, and the local tourism industry in particular.
Charter business? Mostly Australian resource projects.
Velocity partners? Australian companies like Coles a few Banks, Hertz, Thrifty etc
Plus the undeniable elephant in the room that (sure VA are a bit of a mess), they are the only competitor to the Qantas group so waving through a massive monopoly on such a capital intensive highly regulated, specialised, and vital part of the transportation economy would be a massive drain on the economy.
I think owning an airline or two would be the very last resort of the current federal government, but they would certainly be open to the idea of giving some sort of assistance and relief for airlines so they at least have the time to restructure themselves and survive so that once the COVID-19 issue is over we still have a way of getting around the country.
Completely agree with your post, apart from the last paragraph. I don't think the government will let the airline fold for the reasons you state (an as a loyal customer myself, I don't want Virgin to fail. When Ansett failed Qantas prices and cost cutting went up and the quality went down). There is a question on how that would happen - the government certainly doesn't want to run an airline but that's quite different to getting shares back in return for a large investment. In the face of the likely dire economic situation, many companies won't be saved. Many jobs will be lost. The government will have to be selective on where it spends its money. The optics of handing it to a foreign owned company would be toxic (it's not "some" as you say, it's over 90%!). So sure, save the furniture, but repossess the house as you do. Exactly what happened to Air New Zealand.