- Joined
- Jul 27, 2015
- Posts
- 923
The Australian article begins with Scurrah talking about being at Ansett when it collapsed and how difficult it was for everyone.
The writer (former aviation editor at the Oz) then continues:
The writer (former aviation editor at the Oz) then continues:
[Virgin] looks grim — it is grim — but it is not Ansett.
The factors behind Ansett’s downfall were many and complex but the trigger was a decision by Air New Zealand to exercise its pre-emptive rights on a half share owned by News Ltd.
A deal had been done for the stake to be taken over by deep-pocketed Singapore Airlines, with the proviso that then Ansett chief executive Rod Eddington stay at the helm.
...
The latest estimate of Virgin’s economic contribution to Australia is about $11bn but the airline says the loss would amount to $30bn if it were to disappear because of the flow-on impact to jobs, infrastructure and suppliers.
...
There is also another key difference when it comes to the situation with Ansett, according to Virgin founder and former chief executive Brett Godfrey.
He notes that at the time of Ansett’s collapse, there were already two other more efficient airlines operating in Australia — the Qantas Group and the small but disruptive Virgin Blue.
“If you take a step back and look at the differences, they were that you had an airline (Virgin Blue) that had nine aeroplanes in the market at that time and a trajectory that showed it had great potential to fill the void,’’ he says. “And so they were able to step into the breach.
“It’s different this time because you don’t have an indispensable second competitor in the wings.” ...
NoCookies | The Australian
www.theaustralian.com.au
Last edited by a moderator: