- Joined
- Oct 13, 2013
- Posts
- 15,445
True,and I agree, though it's discussions like these and above all "Travel" which is a cure for bigotryIt's a complex topic, and well out-of-scope for AFF
True,and I agree, though it's discussions like these and above all "Travel" which is a cure for bigotryIt's a complex topic, and well out-of-scope for AFF
100% agreed! Travel is a truly humbling experience.True,and I agree, though it's discussions like these and above all "Travel" which is a cure for bigotry
And in addition to anglicised names, aren't there plenty of Goans with Portuguese surnames?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I imagine the days of Biometric or Facial recognition boarding gates are not too far off, definitely likely for International travel soon enough.And if priority scanning was done properly then it could recognise that the person attempting to board wasn't in the correct queue/group, give a big buzz and the person on the scanner could ask them to move aside until their boarding group was called.
Non-judgemental and any thing that goes wrong can be blamed on the computer.
And a few people from Pondicherry with French surnames. Street names in Pondicherry are in French. Last time I went to was in 2019 and the drive to the beach is called "Rue De La Marine" or similar.And in addition to anglicised names, aren't there plenty of Goans with Portuguese surnames?
As mentioned by the others, if OP could have gotten name of agent, it would help in putting down facts.
But if no name, will be harder.
OP got the name of the VA agent ... I'm guessing from the above statement.Yes certainly have enough to identify the agent.
if we could be their Granparents
I imagine the days of Biometric or Facial recognition boarding gates are not too far off, definitely likely for International travel soon enough.
No doubt, and I'm certain it's no longer a technical constraint, but more a legal/ethics issue that airports, security and government agencies are grappling with.Already happening in multiple countries
Having just been a special guest for a conference in Indian that's not how the name situation was explained for Southern India.In some parts of India too, they follow their father's first name, John Jacobs, they will take the name of John as their surname, esp sons, from when they were born.
And not Jacobs.
Wanted to share with the AFF community an exceptionally poor experience I had at SYD yesterday.
As a bit of background, I have been a VA fan since the Virgin Blue days and have held SG continuously since 2018. I'm just short of WP and on track to achieve it with my next trip. I fly regularly enough to be familiar with the benefits and this was my 9th flight in 6 weeks, 7 of which were in J.
PB was called and I stepped up along with the other passengers. An elderly white (this is important) gentleman further up in the queue was ineligible and politely asked to wait. Everyone else scanned a boarding pass and moved on.
Eventually it was my turn. I scanned the boarding pass from my Google Wallet (noting the Google one doesn't change colour to reflect status like the VA app does, but being a bigger barcode I find it scans better so always use it) and after the successful beep, the gate agent said she needed to see my seat number and grabbed for my phone. This is where things started going south. After seeing I was in an Economy row, she said to me in the most condescending manner imaginable: "What makes you think YOU'RE allowed to board?".
I was shocked to be spoken to in this way and opened the VA app to show my Frequent Flyer card. On seeing this she became increasingly defensive, saying it was my responsibility to show a frequent flyer card to her first before the boarding pass. I asked if my details came up on her screen and this is where the racism / racial profiling got kicked up a notch. She took a look at her screen, saw my name (conventional western first name and surname), took one look at my South Asian appearance and said "This says xx_. Are you xx_?"
I'm not an idiot and knew better than to escalate the situation so I confirmed that I was who my boarding pass and frequent flyer card said I was, reiterated I am entitled to board and continued on my way. There was no apology offered, nor admission that she had crossed the line.
I have zero issues with enforcing PB, in fact I encourage it, but it has to be done in a non-discriminatory and non-accusatory way. This agent failed on both counts and it was made even more obvious by the treatment of the ineligible white passenger. If an agent would like some confirmation of eligibility that is absolutely fine, I'll gladly provide it and have done so on other airlines in the past, but to make assumptions and be so blatantly told "What makes you think YOU'RE allowed to board?" is unacceptable.
I'm keen to hear whether others have had the same / similar experiences to me. I would like to think I'm the first to experience such behaviour but I'm almost certain I'm not.
I will of course be making a formal complaint, the outcome of which will determine whether I continue giving Virgin my loyalty or switch to a competitor. At least in the times Qantas has let me down they've let down all their passengers, it wasn't personal!
I don't agreeAll the responses here have been pretty moderate.
My comment is NOT about the OP. It is about how the customer service person's potential experiences with people, who are NOT the OP, might have clouded their judgment.OP seems to have a very strong command of the english language so I don't think your point is relevant.
Already happening in multiple countries
Last November i boarded a Qantas Flight at LAX TBIT using facial recognitionNo doubt, and I'm certain it's no longer a technical constraint, but more a legal/ethics issue that airports, security and government agencies are grappling with.
Of course! TKWYA!Last November i boarded a Qantas Flight at LAX TBIT using facial recognition