Yada Yada
Established Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2004
- Posts
- 1,875
Lindsay Wilson said:Who is admin...think about it guys...
I've spoken to admin a couple of times
That's not enough info for me. Any more clues? :?
Lindsay Wilson said:Who is admin...think about it guys...
I've spoken to admin a couple of times
Clifford Reichlin. :wink: The founder of this wonderful site.Yada Yada said:That's not enough info for me. Any more clues? :?
JohnK said:Clifford Reichlin. :wink: The founder of this wonderful site.Yada Yada said:That's not enough info for me. Any more clues? :?
Hope I got the identity and the spelling right. :roll:
I think 2 different people.Yada Yada said:JohnK said:Clifford Reichlin. :wink: The founder of this wonderful site.Yada Yada said:That's not enough info for me. Any more clues? :?
Hope I got the identity and the spelling right. :roll:
Thanks John. Is this also the person who goes by the username clifford?
After reading you theory of dark suckers again there are not enough HP's in a QP to prove the theory of darkness.NM said:Now, a more appropriate question may be "how many HPs does it take to prove the theory of darkness?".
NM said:Can we please stop all this silly discussion about light bulbs.
Its has been well proven that the glass bublus devices that screw into sockets do not actually produce light, so how can we call them light bulbs? They do, in fact, consume darkness - thus making them dark suckers and not light generators.
This can easily be proven by noting the colour a fluorescent tube at the end of its life. The ends of the tube are in fact blackened since they have consumed all the darkness they are able to consume and have since expired as efficient dark suckers.
Another example is a blown bulb from you car break indicators. These also are blacked since they have consumed their fill of darkness.
Without power applied to a dark sucker it will not consume any darkness. Hence the natural state is one of darkness. So the only way to alter that natural darkness state is to remove the darkness. Hence when power is applied to a dark sucker, it goes about its task of clearing the darkness from the room. This happens very quickly as the darkness is drawn toward the dark sucker at the speed of darkness (which is equal in magnitude but in the opposite directional vector to what some misguided scientists would have us believe is the speed of light).
So please cease the continuation of the myth of light bulbs. Dark suckers do need to be replaced from time to time as they fill up due to the volume of consumed darkness. But since there is no such thing as a light bulb I can safely assure you that the answer to all these silly questions about the labour requirement for changing said mythical device is always "none, there is no such thing as a light bulb".
Now, a more appropriate question may be "how many HPs does it take to prove the theory of darkness?".
And don't forget to add Metric Time to the book 8) .MetroAir said:That, and browski's scientific theory about saturn are going into my 'Exceptionally good theories' book that I am going to write one day
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
serfty said:How many MUA* workers does it take to change a L.. er Dark Sucker?
53! (Got a problem with that?) :twisted:
(*MUA: Maritime union of Australia)
NM said:And don't forget to add Metric Time to the book 8) .MetroAir said:That, and browski's scientific theory about saturn are going into my 'Exceptionally good theories' book that I am going to write one day
I can probably help with a few other theories as well :wink: .
Dark suckers, not light bulbs :? , metric time theory. Einstein could have had a little help with his theory of relativity and Darwin definately needed help with his theory of evolution. Where is good help when you need it. :roll:NM said:And don't forget to add Metric Time to the book 8) .
I can probably help with a few other theories as well :wink: .
NM said:Can we please stop all this silly discussion about light bulbs.
Its has been well proven that the glass bublus devices that screw into sockets do not actually produce light, so how can we call them light bulbs? They do, in fact, consume darkness - thus making them dark suckers and not light generators.
And then they just release the extra back into the air. It appear as a dark smoke-like substance.shillard said:You forgot the most telling point in the whole conspiracy - the dark that gets sucked out is transmitted along the power lines back to the energy companies, who use it to generate electrickery.
They charge us for power that is generated by our own dark!
Good one Craigo . Reminds me of the ubiquitous nice shot one hears when playing/ watching golf here :shock: .Craigo said:I can keep it on-topic and indulge in the off-topic discussion. As a part-time ski instructor, I can tell you how many ski instructors it takes to change a light bulb - 10, one to screw the bulb in and the other nine to look on admiringly and say "nice turns". BlacKnox will appreciate that one .