'Your London Booking'

Status
Not open for further replies.
I might be just an old fashioned business owner but see this purely as Qantas management resorting to desperate and in my mind unethical measures to try and limit their short term losses regardless of the consequences.
Attempting to poach passengers already booked with their airline partner and not highlighting the downsides for those accepting the offer to switch from EK is just plain wrong.

No different to EK handing QFF elites pre-filled in Skywards enrollment forms.

Also the OP's original flight is on a QF code. So as far as QF are concerned, they are just offering their customers a different flight and it's up to the customer to decide what's the best option for them.
 
So QF enters into an EK partnership with no Code of Conduct / Ethics agreed to so within a year has degenerated into the prevailing 'dog eat dog' mentality.
Not a good look for all involved and can see an end game with only one possible outcome based on size and resources.
 
So QF enters into an EK partnership with no Code of Conduct / Ethics agreed to so within a year has degenerated into the prevailing 'dog eat dog' mentality.
Not a good look for all involved and can see an end game with only one possible outcome based on size and resources.

Perhaps. But EK started it.

Don't get caught up thinking QF wants this escalating but they've probably got no choice.

I wonder how many CL's are now IO's...
 
I don't see why everyone is getting up in arms about this.

It's a QF ticket, on a QF flight number and is a sensible option for QF to offer their customer a better option which could end up being a more convenient route for the customer. So really it's a win-win in my mind.

For example last year I had booked MEL-SYD-HKG, a) because it was cheaper than the direct MEL-HKG flight b) I wanted to visit the SYD Flounge
A week before the flight QF reservations called me to say they noticed I had booked this route, and wanted to know if I wanted to shift to the direct flight as it was quicker and at no charge to me despite the MEL-HKG being more full/expensive.
I politely declined and mentioned I wanted to go via Sydney to use the SYD Flounge which they had no problems with.

I see no problem at all to give your customers other options which may be of benefit to them both time-wise and at no extra cost to them. I know the OP's scenario is slightly different in it involves another airline, but with codesharing the inventory allocated to the marketing carrier is essentially their own inventory although technically its not, so the marketing carrier can do and offer what it sees fit, the key thing is here is that it is an Option not a forced re-route.

My2c :)
 
So QF enters into an EK partnership with no Code of Conduct / Ethics agreed to so within a year has degenerated into the prevailing 'dog eat dog' mentality.
Not a good look for all involved and can see an end game with only one possible outcome based on size and resources.

Exactly. Doesn't look good for all. Although I'm not sure how much EK care about that as long as they keep making money.
 
I see no problem at all to give your customers other options which may be of benefit to them both time-wise and at no extra cost to them. I know the OP's scenario is slightly different in it involves another airline, but with codesharing the inventory allocated to the marketing carrier is essentially their own inventory although technically its not, so the marketing carrier can do and offer what it sees fit, the key thing is here is that it is an Option not a forced re-route.

My2c :)

This.

QF (should) know they need to keep their high value customers happy. And offering options is one such way.
 
I don't know how QF can be competitive when their prices are so much higher than the competition! I just bought J class tickets to London on MH for a little over $5900 but, for the same dates, QF are asking for something like $8200!! Premium Y fares on QF were around the $5000 mark. Er...I don't think so! MH it is and I get more SCs than if I had booked on QF!

That's fine, but please don't be one of those people who then says "QF must stay Australian owned", "QF must be saved", "QF must keep jobs in Australia", etc.

I happily pay more to fly on QF, because I know that's keeping Australians in jobs. (Same reason I have always insisted on buying Australian-made cars .... which, sadly, I'm not going to be able to do for much longer!)
 
In Dec had the opportunity to visit the DXB F Lounge there and back and I wasn't completely blown away... great restaurant, humungous but the showers I thought were pretty small and ratty, towels frayed and showing their age, and it was too warm in there :(

First world problems I know, however my two favourite F lounges remain the SYD QF Flounge for the food and spa, and the HKG F Lounge Wing with the revamped cabanas and food.

I think the food at DXB F can be a lot better than MEL/SYD F lounges - basically good restaurant, compared to good cafe - but a factor in this is basically getting a bit bored/familar with the QF lounges.

The lounge itself is big, impersonal and dull and also not a fan of the showers. I had one with no ventilation and after a long hot shower the placed was basically a sauna, by the time I get dressed I think I had more sweat on me than before the shower!
 
It's a QF ticket, on a QF flight number and is a sensible option for QF to offer their customer a better option which could end up being a more convenient route for the customer. So really it's a win-win in my mind.

For example last year I had booked MEL-SYD-HKG, a) because it was cheaper than the direct MEL-HKG flight b) I wanted to visit the SYD Flounge
A week before the flight QF reservations called me to say they noticed I had booked this route, and wanted to know if I wanted to shift to the direct flight as it was quicker and at no charge to me despite the MEL-HKG being more full/expensive.
I politely declined and mentioned I wanted to go via Sydney to use the SYD Flounge which they had no problems with.

I see no problem at all to give your customers other options which may be of benefit to them both time-wise and at no extra cost to them. I know the OP's scenario is slightly different in it involves another airline, but with codesharing the inventory allocated to the marketing carrier is essentially their own inventory although technically its not, so the marketing carrier can do and offer what it sees fit, the key thing is here is that it is an Option not a forced re-route.

My2c :)

In this case, cmon0005 is right.

As part of our partnership with Emirates, we continue to review opportunities to make changes for the benefit of our mutual customers. Currently, Qantas has reasonable availability on its London Heathrow services during this period. By making this opportunity available, it may better suit the travel plans for customers travelling this route.

It is only an offer, and not at all a schedule change.
 
That's fine, but please don't be one of those people who then says "QF must stay Australian owned", "QF must be saved", "QF must keep jobs in Australia", etc.
I am definitely not one of those people. I will happily fly QF if they are competitive. I have a price range I'm willing to pay for certain flights. For example, I would never ever pay more than $6.5k for a J ticket to Europe but my preference is to try and get that J ticket for $6k or less. If QF offered a J ticket to London for under $6.5k, I would seriously consider them. Same for flights to the US. I will always try to get a J ticket to LA for around $5.5k (and up to $6.5k to New York). I have booked QF almost every time over the last 3-4 years for my flights to the US because they have been able to price their ticket to a level I considered reasonable. Mind you, I have the luxury of planning ahead and this gives me the flexibility to book anywhere from 6-12 months ahead.
 
In this case, cmon0005 is right.

As part of our partnership with Emirates, we continue to review opportunities to make changes for the benefit of our mutual customers. Currently, Qantas has reasonable availability on its London Heathrow services during this period. By making this opportunity available, it may better suit the travel plans for customers travelling this route.

It is only an offer, and not at all a schedule change.
Thanks for chiming in Red Roo- can you please confirm that my DXB-PER connection will be protected if I choose to take the offer and change departure to LHR?
 
I don't see why everyone is getting up in arms about this.

It's a QF ticket, on a QF flight number and is a sensible option for QF to offer their customer a better option which could end up being a more convenient route for the customer. So really it's a win-win in my mind.

For example last year I had booked MEL-SYD-HKG, a) because it was cheaper than the direct MEL-HKG flight b) I wanted to visit the SYD Flounge
A week before the flight QF reservations called me to say they noticed I had booked this route, and wanted to know if I wanted to shift to the direct flight as it was quicker and at no charge to me despite the MEL-HKG being more full/expensive.
I politely declined and mentioned I wanted to go via Sydney to use the SYD Flounge which they had no problems with.

I see no problem at all to give your customers other options which may be of benefit to them both time-wise and at no extra cost to them. I know the OP's scenario is slightly different in it involves another airline, but with codesharing the inventory allocated to the marketing carrier is essentially their own inventory although technically its not, so the marketing carrier can do and offer what it sees fit, the key thing is here is that it is an Option not a forced re-route.

My2c :)

Hope they do the same for me on a SYD-MEL-SIN I've got coming up (with 6am ex SY :( )
 
Thanks for chiming in Red Roo- can you please confirm that my DXB-PER connection will be protected if I choose to take the offer and change departure to LHR?

It would be best to discuss your options with Reservations on 131313.
 
I find the EK First Lounge in DXB excellent. It has never been noisy when I have been in there. The food is exceptional as well.

EH
 
I find the EK First Lounge in DXB excellent. It has never been noisy when I have been in there. The food is exceptional as well.

EH

Same, although their definition of a "buffet" is somewhat different - a waiter stands beside you with the plate, while another waiter puts the food onto it! No self-service there!!

(I actually had a tug-of-war with the waiter as I tried to take control of the plate!)
 
If the seat is going to be empty anyway, then you would want to fill it with anything that gives you more than the marginal cost of providing the service.

The problem with this is, when people catch on and realise that Qantas does this, everyone will know to simply wait until the last minute to book. The end result is less revenue for QF.
 
Turn business expenses into Business Class! Sign up by March 3 and pay a $10,000+ ATO bill—like BAS—through pay.com.au to unlock up to 300,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.

Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:
✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top