When you watch the replay it had to be a split second decision for HAM due to his speed and ROS being in harvesting mode meant that there was quite a large speed differential between the two Mercedes cars at that moment, the 3 choices HAM had were
1. do nothing and drive straight up the back of ROS's car = stupid option
2. take the inside line and hope that the overtake sticks or that ROS realizes that I am on his inside = riskier option but hey they're paid to race!
3. take the outside line and hope that ROS realises I am there even if I don't overtake we would both still be in the race = still may have been the safer option (in hindsight)
I only wanted to make the point that HAM had a very short time to make that decision but I still sort of think that both Mercedes drivers can share the blame here.
About RIC and the 2-stop vs 3 stop strategy, there is an interesting comment by RIC that I can quote here:
"Sure I'm bitter right now – not with Max, not at all, just bitter at the situation."
Ricciardo said his performance "just didn't make any sense". "Seb had already jumped us. Then you're required to pass not only Seb but then pass three cars on track when we know we're down on speed and it's a hard track to pass on," he said. "It just didn't make any sense. I thought, at the time, we did it because everyone else was going to do it.
"Normally, the guy in the lead gets the better strategy (but) it didn't work out today."
Read more:
Daniel Ricciardo laments Red Bull strategy in Spanish Grand Prix
Follow us:
@smh on Twitter |
sydneymorningherald on Facebook
So the implication is that maybe Red Bull "split their strategy" between a 2 stop and 3 stop
in reaction to Ferrari splitting their strategy. As others have pointed out its just a weird situation when you think about it because when you look at the quotes from RIC above, you could feasibly put those words in the mouth of VET and they would be equally relevant to VET and the Ferrari strategies! As RIC implies in his comments - you could understand the Ferrari team trying to make something happen as they were behind the Red Bull team when they started to split their strategy given that they had a faster car in a straight line than Red Bull, but a difficult track to overtake and it looked that "the undercut" was working as a viable strategy at the time.
Anyway - the lack of Mercedes cars running allowed the focus of the race to fall on the Red Bull and Ferrari teams and their various strategies/bluffs and counter bluffs so that VES, RIC and VET and RAI were fighting for 1st to 4th places in Spain rather than all of them fighting for a 3rd podium place.
I'll also add that I saw it live on Fox instead of the delayed highlights telecast on Ten/One, it would have been a very confusing mess to watch it on the One/Ten delayed highlights package (especially if you hadn't had the result spoilt).