drron
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2002
- Posts
- 35,819
Absolutely not.Turnbull declared the leadership vacant.He still got a majority of votes but it was reasonably close so after a few days resigned.Dutton did not have the numbers so I can't see how the right was dominant.Drron, you do agree though that the right/more conservative members of the coalition government have had a powerful position? The party was dragged much more to the right under their influence.
I tend to disagree on your assessment of Turnbull - to get the top job he had to court the right and was effectively without the ability to put his stamp on government. Many, including me, had high hopes but in the end he couldn’t perform. IMO Abbott was much more of a destabilising influence both within the house and through his many public speeches/pronouncements.
Turnbull has history.On at least 2 occasions in the past he tried to enter parliament.On both occasions he approached the ALP first and then the Liberal party.This has been very well documented by Richo.In the early 80s I was peripherally involved in what I think was the first attempt.
It is obvious that even in this thread people who thought Turnbull was a good leader of the Liberals are people who don't vote Liberal.He was the major destabiliser of the Liberal Party.