Flying mermaid
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2011
- Posts
- 6,125
- Qantas
- Platinum
Paul Kelly just called the towers vertical cruise ships He said we just haven’t seen this level of community spread in Australia before,
I don’t think anyone would like people being forcibly tested, but a choice like that for community good seems sensible.
Isn’t that what I said?These are times when choice is not in the public good. Either take the test or continued isolation.
I don't know, but your first post on this particular subject was written just like Pushka interpreted it. I don't think there is a need to make a big thing about it.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Isolation and quarantine can mean slightly different things.Isn’t that what I said?
I’d suggest he hasn’t had a relative in a nursing home during influenza or Noro alert where the % of infected per pop would be greater.Paul Kelly just called the towers vertical cruise ships He said we just haven’t seen this level of community spread in Australia before,
Agree with what you say.A significant issue the Vic gov will be well aware of that it is pretty pointless to beat the chest over fines and user imposed quarantine costs for people living in the nine towers. The vast majority are there for a reason - insufficient funds to live anywhere else (other than the streets).
So while actively looking to both be looking like being tough & simultaneously avoiding allegations of discrimination; they need to carefully treat the vulnerable population in a different way to the announcements of what will happen in more affluent suburbs.
Agree with what you say.
But now they have put the stake in the ground.
Gladys (NSW) is probably now regretting the stake in the ground re paying for quarantine of overseas arrivals. It was probably the right thing to do but where is the point when it’s not.
According to ABC website Covid live blog, Vic CHO has stated a revised figure of 67, as a result of reclassification.Not sure if noted up thread
Today’s Victorian number is 74
16 from controlled outbreak
1 from quarantine
4 from routine testing
53 under investigation
He said we just haven’t seen this level of community spread in Australia before
For the sake of reason, we haven’t really been testing for it either. There will be plenty of firsts for a while!
The only way to shed some positivity on this is that, after nearly 6 months, this will be a genuine test of our systems. We “flattened the curve“ and ruined a lot of lives while “getting the system ready to cope”. A localized outbreak is exactly what our best case scenario was, so now it’s happened this is the time to test it.
If, in 2 weeks time, the hospitals aren’t struggling, ICU isn’t overflowing and people with no prior medical issues aren’t dropping dead in the corridors, then the exercise is a success. At least we have something to work with now.
That prompts an interesting question. What was expected (say in volume), when and and by whom.
I would suspect (with no actual knowledge) that politicians in the national cabinet hadn't got around to that that even if the medicos had maybe pondered the subject.
I have to admit I use them interchangeably, so I think it is semantics. People either do the test or are kept away from others until the risk is past.Isolation and quarantine can mean slightly different things.
I view isolation as being at home and more a voluntarily choice to abide by a request/recommendation and quarantine as more mandatory and a requirement and usually away from home.
I’ve been guilty of using the terms interchangeably, but there is a slight difference if one wanted to be precise.
The hard lockdown of the public housing towers is a mix of those - a requirement but at home. It really feels like one step away from the hotel quarantine for overseas arrivals.
The other aspect is who pays for it/living expenses. More people are coming to the view that at certain stages it should be borne by the individual, particularly if they had a hand in extending it unnecessarily.
PS not even saying that you used the terms incorrectly, just adding to the thread/flow of conversation.
Edit: I don’t think there is much difference between a choice between testing or longer quarantine/isolation or no choice either do a test or be isolated/quarantined. Semantics perhaps?!
Sorry I shouldn’t have condensed his comment. He said we haven’t seen this level of community spread of COVID-19 before. Typing is a challenge for me so I do condense....I’d suggest he hasn’t had a relative in a nursing home during influenza or Noro alert where the % of infected per pop would be greater.
Twiggy obtained 10 million from the Chinese - managed to snatch them from the Yanks in spite of them offering more, because of his connections.Acting Federal CMO has mentioned amongst other things that we have conducted 2.7 million tests.
Does anyone know how many kits we have?
I remember 10million being obtained/ordered, but not much else on the matter.
You are not aloneDon't you dare talk about the future and living with the virus, its too much common sense for a Sunday
You are not alone