Think of all the new faces though!I would think there are many other reasons before Covid they should resign. No wonder the Feds don’t want an ICAC, if the same rules applied to them there are a number who would be in serious trouble.
Think of all the new faces though!I would think there are many other reasons before Covid they should resign. No wonder the Feds don’t want an ICAC, if the same rules applied to them there are a number who would be in serious trouble.
Your post is excellent and I only reproduce it above as a link only to save space.They want a concrete figure
In the case of NSW, they seem to have selected an outcome on the high/worse side, and planned to meet that during October. If it doesn't reach those levels (and it appears it hasn't/won't) then they can breath a sigh of relief.Your post is excellent and I only reproduce it above as a link only to save space.
One of the problems is that while modellers report their findings and posit a variety of possible outcomes, those at the public face will target only one outcome/or narrative - usually one that fits their agenda.
In the end it is no surprise that the actual outcome is going to be different and no surprise if it matches the modelling.
Maybe, and likely the accompanying fear factor boosted the Vax rates. Is that good or bad?. I don’t know. Possibly means that there is only one bullet in the chamber. Pull the trigger and sell the bad news but don’t expect people to react the same way next time when the story turns out to be different to that which was sold because they then realise they were not given the full storysigh of relief.
Which seem reasonable when one is relying on a limited resource like hospitals to treat the most serious cases. The ICU number was a NSW government number from a number of models - it was not Burnet's number. And the 'peak' two weeks later for the bulk of serious ICU-level cases seemed reasonable.In the case of NSW, they seem to have selected an outcome on the high/worse side, and planned to meet that during October. If it doesn't reach those levels (and it appears it hasn't/won't) then they can breath a sigh of relief.
For those of you outside NSW:
...
.
But in the context of management of the pandemic,...
...where most NSW government pandemic decision are decided by a Crisis Cabinet. The only person's seat in Crisis Cabinet that will not change is the Deputy Premier. Others may move and the composition may alter.It will be interesting to see if there would be any changes the direction the NSW government goes with this.
Much as I have given my bosses a hard time from time to time I have had my share of good advice. One of the best was ‘under promise and over deliver’, seems they might have received similar advice.In the case of NSW, they seem to have selected an outcome on the high/worse side, and planned to meet that during October. If it doesn't reach those levels (and it appears it hasn't/won't) then they can breath a sigh of relief.
"I'm Vaxxed shouldnt be a big deal if i get it"So what are people's opinion/narrative to explain ACT's numbers?
'Record' positive tests against the backdrop of high vaccination rates and in their quasi-lockdown. 13 in hospital and 3 in ICU with ventilator patients.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Singapore daily cases have doubled in the past week from 1443 last Saturday to 2909 yesterday.Interesting report on the current situation in Singapore.
Singapore tightens COVID-19 rules despite 80 per cent vaccination rate
Singapore’s latest move to combat COVID-19 appears to shift away from the country’s stated transition toward living with the virus.www.smh.com.au
I wouldn't be surprised if Sydney found itself in a similar situation come December... Will be interesting to see what happens then.
Not sure what this has to do with Australian Reports of the Virus Spread?Singapore cases have doubled in the past week from 1443 last Saturday to 2909 yesterday.
The ACTs numbers are about what you would expect.