lovetravellingoz
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 12,704
I prefer to call them people failures. This is 100% about human behaviour in response (or lack of response) to the virus.
That was part of it. But contact tracing etc were also not up to scratch and so also system failures. Not enough workplaces had adopted CV19 measures. And in Aged Care the CV19 guidelines were not being followed at many facilities leaving them vulnerable. So again system failures.
Also part of it was probably being caught unawares that a second wave had started due to new strains having emerged.
As genomic testing lags positive tests by several weeks that part was less surprising, but it probably in part led to the "new" cases just being considered as first wave cases that had popped up rather than the tip of an entirely new CV19 iceberg.
ie They probably thought they were stamping out embers, when in fact an entirely new bushfire had started.
The timing of the second wave starting at exactly the same time as the first wave was being extinguished was most unfortunate. I suspect that if it had been say a month later then there would have been a better response.
They might be correct as at day of reporting but cases get resolved/unresolved over time. Right now it’s:
I could be mistaken but I think I read that the 28th September was a hard date and 26th October was flexibleI think Vic community transmission (unknown source/mystery case) is up net 6 today.
As Melbourne gets to below 50 for the 14-day average,it will be interesting to what ‘not a day longer than necessary’ means, since there is a date and a target range. In the event it is say 29.9 before 28 September, you would hope Vic Premier/CHO pull the trigger early.
Yes that’s my understanding too (it’s a hard date), but it would be a great move to actually do something surprising when you are below the target range early despite the hard date.I could be mistaken but I think I read that the 28th September was a hard date and 26th October was flexible
I think Vic community transmission (unknown source/mystery case) is up net 6 today.
As Melbourne gets to below 50 for the 14-day average,it will be interesting to what ‘not a day longer than necessary’ means, since there is a date and a target range. In the event it is say 29.9 before 28 September, you would hope Vic Premier/CHO pull the trigger early.
Interesting this morning some discussion of transmission within a specific community in SE Melbourne. I hope they can achieve a better outcome, and have learnt good lessons, and we don't see a repeat of last time when the disease got into a socioeconomically disadvantaged community.
There is so much correcting of Victorian data going on at present , together with cases under investigation, that it is a but difficult to actually know what the true unknown/mystery cases on an given day actually is.
Also it is quite normal that what might be a mystery case, will not stay that after investigation.
View attachment 227390
Yes we can hope.
They look to be taking several days longer with Regional Vic on a smaller target of 5 to move to the less restrictive step, so with a higher target of 50 (which means more community spread) combined with much greater population spread and mixing (ie at workplaces) my guess is that they will act slower for Melbourne than Regional Vic.
Mind you the next step for Melbourne is not a lot different from the current level anyway. We really need Step 3 to have an appreciable difference including many more back to work.
However the rate new cases per day is dropping is most promising.
Interesting this morning some discussion of transmission within a specific community in SE Melbourne. I hope they can achieve a better outcome, and have learnt good lessons, and we don't see a repeat of last time when the disease got into a socioeconomically disadvantaged community.
Yes and interesting that Syd and Mel are experiencing and reporting exactly same thing today - lower testing numbers than they would both like and also they think there are geographic areas where more people need to be tested (Syd again called out W and SW Syd)
Yes and interesting that Syd and Mel are experiencing and reporting exactly same thing today - lower testing numbers than they would both like and also they think there are geographic areas where more people need to be tested (Syd again called out W and SW Syd)
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
She was asked politely numerous times and she refused to cooperate. So what are police supposed to do? Let her drive on and post her video showing her beating the police? What was the piece of paper in her hand - another script stating she was a sovereign citizen?
It was an ugly scene but I am just not sure how else you handle someone not obeying direct orders...
and some of the candidates for the upcoming ACT election want to bring back fireworks sales for Queens Birthday weekend after they were banded for general sale almost 10 years ago.IIRC the ACT has had the most liberal attitude (least Restrictions) to trading for a very long time. I seem to recall from vague imprecise memories several decades ago you could buy groceries & booze almost anytime anywhere and adult products on sale not available anywhere else in the country.