Just for balance, shouldn't Gladys also express her exasperation at him?
Well the question asked was specifically about Queensland, I was listening to the full presser. But Queensland border closure has much bigger impact to economy as much more movement betwenn NSW and Qld than NSW and SA. Gladys has said no state borders should be closed to NSW.
I suspect once the national hotspot definition is agreed SA will fall into line before Queensland does, given they have taken a first step to reopening to ACT direct flights. Not sure why SA is now wanting to use the Queensland definition, when the previous criteria was different. ALso it wont be up to the SA Police to decide but the SA premier.
Politics aside slamming borders shut when there is one case, without waiting to see if that case is a false positive or linked to known cluster is no way to run a state/country - we will be living with this virus for years, we need to work on workable definitions, which give businesses and individuals some certainty to plan, and allow Aussies to see their interstate family members when management of cases is being effective.
Vic border was only domestic border that needed to close and they shouldn't have to get to zero for it to reopen, which is why NSW is relaxing more regional border bubbles with Vic now that their numbers have improved.
NSW will be the first to reopen to Vic as a whole of that I am sure.
Gladys' language around international arrivals this morning was careful to talk about Australians and how NSW taking lions share was helping reunite Australians from all states,. Unlike AP who believes Queensland is its own country. The most effective way to force other states to take their fair share and open borders to NSW would be for NSW to stop accepting international arrivals into SYD of non NSW residents - but Gladys is not heartless, she sees a bigger picture than WA, Qld, SA, NT and Tas do atm.