re: [Confirmed] QF removing [cheap] ASAs [from web booking engine Jun 26-was]10April
Perk? No perks here mate - just a willingness to share my experience and knowledge that comes with PAXing in over 1000 commercial flights in the last 18½ years.
TBH, I really believe you should lighten up.
Have you lost out with this more that anyone else?
You obviously had time to consider your options given your posts on this thread yesterday afternoon - it's: 1) not like there was no indication something was happening and 2) the U class JASA's are generally fully refundable.
Disappointed that you take that reaction to my posts,
serfty and I apologise if you feel offended. I haven't mentioned anything remotely to impute that you have done anything except to be an asset to this site, nor to suggest that you have received any 'perks'. "Perks" was the term used by
another poster, not me, to describe the ability of someone who got information and then do certain things: viz (my bolding):
The way I see it is:
1. The mods were invited to a 4pm briefing on the change of the website
2. A condition of this invite is they were gagged until 6am from discussing it
3.
If a mod took advantage of what was gleaned at that briefing then it could be considered a perk. (so what)4. There was ample other information in this thread for members to form their own opinion, and book ASA's should then consider so.
5. I think the mods do a tremendous job
6. Nothing more to see here people, move on please
Frankly I'm appalled such an attitude. Doesn't matter if its in business, at the tennis club, on an anonymous internet forum; I think its repugnant.
I may well need to lighten up. But until I breach some forum rules and am knocked off, I'm content to maintain my rage, if that's OK.
The changes to the QF ASAs isn't the point for me (although the web site stuff ups are). But it doesn't require me -
or anyone - to have "lost out" more to talk about the need for transparency - and that's what I've mainly been banging on about. I think this is an important site. I think for it to remain that way it needs to demonstrate transparency, when mods and others are getting certain privileges from outside agencies . I've said several times that I don't mind if certain contributors / mods /whoever get certain benefits such as trips away, or advance notice of changes. I've said several times, good luck to 'em! But I ask again - why not have those things declared, transparently? What's the problem?
Serfty, I do respect you. If you can give a decent argument as to why there shouldn't be
plain disclosure of when there is a private briefing (after any embargo, if required), or if free trips are given (and their conditions) or anything of the like, then I'll say, well, we'll see what's said.
I've put the same thing to Admin.
What's it to be, I'm wondering.