TheRealTMA
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Posts
- 7,889
- Qantas
- Platinum
Try the price of fish.
Never mind the fish! Frenched Lamb Chops $59/KG.
Try the price of fish.
Never mind the fish! Frenched Lamb Chops $59/KG.
Crazy that Tomatoes are more expensive then most fruit at the moment.
Well yes. But fish is good for you. Lamb is just delicious. In Adelaide Flathead is $50 kilo but saw it in Melbourne markets for $25
Well yes. But fish is good for you. Lamb is just delicious. In Adelaide Flathead is $50 kilo but saw it in Melbourne markets for $25
Their local growing season was badly affected by weather so there is a short supply.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Oops, perhaps too many free coughtails on the package already???:mrgreen:Oops. Wrong thread.
Oops, perhaps too many free coughtails on the package already???:mrgreen:
No. that's just plain mean of me.
I hate this "serve" concept. It is so unscientific. What is wrong with 5 x 50g, or 3 x 75g or whatever it is. Then you would know exactly how much you are supposed to eat. I have big hands, so is my handful of cherries, one serve or two?The message used to be five serves of fruit a day but that's changed to vegetables. Fruit contains a lot of sugar.
Haha, because I'm sitting here with a 475ml tub of ice cream and it says "Servings per pack: 5" and the tub is half gone just this evening.I hate this "serve" concept. It is so unscientific. What is wrong with 5 x 50g, or 3 x 75g or whatever it is. Then you would know exactly how much you are supposed to eat. I have big hands, so is my handful of cherries, one serve or two?
And the other downside is I am not allowed to turn up the volume knob past the 10 o'clock position in my own home!!!. Surround sound is not surround sound without high dynamic range. I was told that it's bad for my ears......
Very little real evidence to suggest vitamin supplements are worthwhile unless you have a proven deficiency.
They do best in nature's original packaging.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/...myth-why-we-think-we-need-supplements/277947/
There is a formula for what a constitutes a serve.I hate this "serve" concept. It is so unscientific. What is wrong with 5 x 50g, or 3 x 75g or whatever it is. Then you would know exactly how much you are supposed to eat. I have big hands, so is my handful of cherries, one serve or two?
that is very useful! So as far as fruit and vegetables go serves are equivalent in kj, but not in grams. 75g of vegetables and 150g of fruit. Now I will be weighing everything for the next couple of weeks Much more useful than things I have seen before (handfuls and size of a baseball).There is a formula for what a constitutes a serve.
https://www.eatforhealth.gov.au/food-essentials/how-much-do-we-need-each-day/serve-sizes
They do best in nature's original packaging.
There is a formula for what a constitutes a serve.
https://www.eatforhealth.gov.au/food-essentials/how-much-do-we-need-each-day/serve-sizes
I don't think it so much the labelling as it is the package sizing for things like chocolates/sweets/yoghurts etc which are usually consumed in one sitting by one person. If the food was packaged in the appropriate single serve size, it would look very small on the shelves and consumers would be inclined to buy larger packs. With regard to things like cereals, the problem is that we tend to eat much more than needed.Interesting - but seems out of touch with what the consumer needs? At least for me. I dunno... do people actually measure out and eat 1/4 of a cup of breakfast cereal? Most people would pour out a fair bit more than that. A chocolate bar is designed to be eaten in one go... why make it 2.3 serves? I'm pretty sure the labeling suits manufacturers, not consumers