Something I just thought: how are the statistics for "alcohol related violence" collected?
For example, if a patient comes into hospital, you would need to establish:
- The patient was involved in a case of violence.
- The violence was a result of alcohol, or highly probable. The patient could well be a "sober" victim and their "drunk" belligerent may or may not be hospitalised alongside them. To be related to alcohol, it probably has to be established via testimony suggesting significant mental impairment (due to alcohol from a "sober" baseline), and/or something like blood alcohol level.
Just seems confusing as someone would need to do a lot of connecting the dots with data
not just collected by the hospital. My guess is that there is other violence which happens not necessarily alcohol-fuelled, though one could still make the argument that violence is violence and the lock out laws address all sorts of those, even if it is merely by limiting foot traffic and numbers.
There was one suggestion on a Facebook comment I read (not backed up by numbers or studies), as an alternative to lockout laws, that full accountability in movement in a critical area and alcohol consumption for all patrons be maintained via ID tracking. For example, when you enter a club, your ID gets scanned. Same when you order a drink, which is also noted down. The data bank would be centralised. The data could even be shared amongst venues, but also accessible by the police and hospital system. The logistics of organising an effective ID system would not be trivial to say the least. Also starts to get a bit tricky if you're ordering for mates, e.g. you're not consuming all of those six drinks being registered against your name (right?). But I think their overall idea is that if a fairly full record of your movement and consumption habits are being recorded, if you mess up, restrictive penalties can be applied on the basis of your record, versus currently where no such record exists and a lot of evidence of patterns have to be more or less guessed or up to witnesses. That increased knowledge of what you are doing would act as a deterrent for you to step out of line and do something stupid.
There's also quite a bit of sentiment there to apply lock down on Star Casino. The only difference is Star Casino is crawling with so much security and cameras, the idea would be that you would find yourself thrown out on your backside back on the street posthaste if you even look like you're about to **** up.