Major changes to Velocity Frequent Flyer announced 17/10/24

I'm a user of Family Pooling, and it still works to a large degree. To retain my WP I'll just need to earn 400 of the 800 myself. That's very fair, no issue.

Although the dynamic pricing will reduce the SC earn rate by good margin.
A $400 J cabin fare MEL-SYD would earn 55sc, now dynamic earn just 33.

Have to do few more detailed checks, but safe to say attaining status with 1 SC per $12 going to require little more moolah than previous.
Such is life.

The Forever GOLD is the big ticket item for many AFF's.
I'm a good way there so will continue the journey.

I see it as 9000 SC as opposed Qantas 14,000 for LTG.
Using family pooling, partners & Flybuys will account for the remaining 3,000 for 12k total.

So more difficult / cost increase to garner SC's in future, but the Life Time Forever Gold benefit hangs in the balance to be attained.

Maybe a few less in lounges in future?? Can't be a terrible thing.
 
On balance, I would say that all these changes are a moderate devaluation of the VFF program.

Revenue based earning will work for some but will hurt the majority. I can understand why this scheme was implemented though.

Personally, the min 50% VA hurts the most as I mostly credit long haul business partner tickets to achieve Platinum. I appreciate the reasoning, but it will be challenging going forward considering VAs International long haul network is non-existent.

Finally, the new earn calculations are pretty simple. So at least we won’t have to be 1% Club Winners to work out the infamous “Simpler and Fairer” tables.
 
knagelli said:
As long as the lounge access benefit is available with partner credit cards , the likes of Platinum Charge Card , there won't be any less in lounge.
Click to expand...
well being more costly to attain lounge worthy status, that is my reasoning for possibly less in lounges.

same access with partner credit cards stays status quo.
 
The only way Id be now inclined to keep my Platinum status is if Rewards flights were released earlier but im now strongly considering moving to QF

Already got Amex Platinum so sorted for lounge
 
As far as we have been on AFF , most of us are using the status to get into lounge but if the status is not maintained anymore , it will be the same bunch of us who will use the credit card benefits to get into the lounge ; sorry not going to spare the frequent flyers looking for some respite :D with less crowd
 
Seems to me this will make earning status credits seriously harder.

Example:

I fly J HBA to BNE via MEL for $1500 return.
At present this earns me 220 SCs

Under the new system, I will earn $1500/12 = 125 SCs

I also lose the ability to gift Platinum to my partner.

Not happy.
 
Check out the latest credit card signup bonus point offers
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I feel like they’ve been reading AFF at least in part - they specifically said Fly Later is a published benefit. We sometimes focus on published vs. unpublished or inconsistent benefits.
 
I'm not clear how this 50% SC flown with VA flights is going to work.

Example:

I need 800 SCs to maintain platinum.

Suppose I earn 400 from VA flights and 600 from partner airlines.

Does that mean that even though I have earnt half the quota with VA I don't qualify because 400 is less than half my total earn?
 
henrus said:
Well there is an article in the AFR today that 90% of gov travel is on Qantas despite BFOD policies in place.
Click to expand...
Yes,I saw that article too, though it's specific to parliamentarians and their staff, not to the whole of government.
www.afr.com

MPs, staff favouring Qantas despite ‘best possible price’ rule

More than 90 per cent of air travel booked by parliamentarians and their offices were on the carrier and its low-cost subsidiary, the highest level in a decade.
www.afr.com www.afr.com
More than 90 per cent of domestic flights booked by federal parliamentarians and their staff are with Qantas and its budget subsidiary Jetstar, delivering the airline $25 million in airfares over the last year.
Click to expand...
The ratio for normal public servants would be very different and nowhere near 90%, though I suspect it would still favour QF.

I have a hunch though that these changes may make the problem worse. Easy earning of status was one attraction of choosing VA and that's going to be less of a factor now. Though I think it looks like it'll still be easier than QF, it won't be as easy as it used to be and if you're going to fall short then there's no incentive to direct business in one direction or another.
 
ferntree said:
I'm not clear how this 50% SC flown with VA flights is going to work.

Example:

I need 800 SCs to maintain platinum.

Suppose I earn 400 from VA flights and 600 from partner airlines.

Does that mean that even though I have earnt half the quota with VA I don't qualify because 400 is less than half my total earn?
Click to expand...

To get to Platinum, you'll need to earn 1000 SCs with 500 SC on VA. So you would not qualify because 400 < 500.
 
This will be no good for me. I'm almost to Silver (should hit that in December) and in the future, getting LESS SCs to get above Silver.....
 
henrus said:
Well there is an article in the AFR today that 90% of gov travel is on Qantas despite BFOD policies in place.
Click to expand...

The article doesn't say that.

There are a few more people on gov travel that are not politicians and direct staff and the overall ratio is very different.

Would be interesting to know what discount the gov has negotiated with each airline and if that is a factor besides any other bias.
 
p--and--t said:
The article doesn't say that.

There are a few more people on gov travel that are not politicians and direct staff and the overall ratio is very different.

Would be interesting to know what discount the gov has negotiated with each airline and if that is a factor besides any other bias.
Click to expand...

It used to be 30% with QF. Not sure if it still is.

From my experience there were more people who wanted to fly VA, as if work travel was the only travel they did they had a chance of getting lounge access.

The people who flew on their own dime (ie overseas) were more likely to fly QF.
 
In my view, an important consideration is that VA has always offered a compelling value proposition: it has been easier to earn status than Qantas, but fewer benefits come with it, especially internationally without being part of an alliance. It was then just a choice to decide if that trade-off worked for you.

These changes will require people to revisit that balance. Everyone will have a different situation, but for me, my immediate reaction is they’ve overshot it a bit: the effort to maintain suddenly looks a lot more similar to other carriers in proper alliances and the more consistent, comprehensive benefits that come with their status.

I mostly fly VA domestically but have appreciated the international partner benefits however patchwork they sometimes are. Too early for me to say conclusively how this will affect future flying, but with a convenient October membership year date and an AMEX Plat that would keep getting me into the lounge regardless (if that isn’t enhanced away), I’ll just let time tell.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Recent Posts

Currently Active Users

Total: 504 (members: 17, guests: 487)
Back
Top