Would you argue that there's no competition in trucking or couriering because roads are publicly funded infrastructure ?I agree that it is infrastructure, we just disagree on the cost and the way it has been justified, politics aside. As do a lot of people whom have posted here before.
Two questions. Whom do these retailers buy access and capacity from? What other alternative providers will there be?
Unless I am mistaken - they all will have to buy access and bandwidth from the NBN.
Or put it another way. Hypothetical - "the government recently announces a ban on commerical arlines flying from Sydney to Melbourne, only Qantas is allowed to fly this route, but you can buy a ticket SYD-MEL from any travel agent in australia that you want. Whichever you choose you will end up on the exact same Qantas aircraft."
Is that your definition of competition?
Point out just one other country that has a similar geographical size and population density to Australia where privately owned fixed-line telecommunications competition is working on a national scale, and you can make this argument - otherwise it's just a red herring (I'll give you a hint: there aren't any).
What are you using it for? Medical teleconferencing, remote education tutorials?First off a bit of a disclaimer, I haven't read the whole thread but am pro NBN, I already have it hooked up at my house and it is brilliant, but more so I believe it is a great forward thinking project for Australia.
That's precisely why I don't want to be forced into it by losing my copper telephone connection in less than a year's time.
Meh ... in 10 years time I am thinking there will be no need for any physical connection at all to attain useful streaming capacity.
Clearly the "thinking" in this case does not involve physics.
I've stayed out of politics discussion on here until now but this NBN thread has peaked my interest.Clearly the "thinking" in this case does not involve physics.
Depends on your definition of useful streaming capacity.Clearly the "thinking" in this case does not involve physics.
Depends on your definition of useful streaming capacity.
Mine is different to yours I guess. So be it.
YMMV ...
1Gbps is already possible via wireless, that would be useful.
And 1. how much spectrum does that use relative to the amount of available right now? 2. Do you propose at more than one person be able to download at that speed?
The basic problem with wireless is that any given speed/spectrum then needs to be divided by the number of simultaneous users because they run it across multiethnic connections. The only way to get gigabit wireless is to have a high speed fibre network linking highly localized base stations.
Has anyone noticed how awesome wireless speeds are for the FIRST users? They always look great. Then as the number of users go up it grinds to a halt? Anyone tried Telstra 3G in Melbourne in the last 12 months? That used to be awesome its been unusable lately. Starting to notice 4g getting choked in some areas already.
Thats on a contention ratio of 1:1 using 1/200000th of the available spectrum in the 60-90GHz band (a 6gbps link using 8 PSK (phase shift keying) modulation and achieving 2.4 bit/s/Hz spectral efficiency has been developed).
We are talking about 10 years time and MAN topologies (2.5km user foot print), bit different out bush but of course so is the NBN
Interested in a technical link to the technology you're talking about?
Will bet London to a brick that fibre optic technology will be many orders of magnitude faster still by that time. You know, physics again and all that.
(actually *current* research lab fibre optic speeds are a petabit per second (a million megabit per second) over 50km fibre lengths).
That's of no real interest to me. I'm only referring to "useful steaming capacity"....
Will bet London to a brick that fibre optic technology will be many orders of magnitude faster still by that time. You know, physics again and all that.
(actually *current* research lab fibre optic speeds are a petabit per second (a million megabit per second) over 50km fibre lengths).
I'm currently quite happy with the 15-20 Mbps I currently enjoy with ADSL. Is something going to happen to take this away?You don't know what you may or may not need in terms of bandwidth in to the future...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Well if you want to stream 4k video in 10 years it won't be sufficient.I'm currently quite happy with the 15-20 Mbps I currently enjoy with ADSL. Is something going to happen to take this away?