Thanks for the warm welcome - I've been lurking for a v. long time & forming ideas so i thought it might be time to start contributing! I'm also a v. disgruntled QF pax and actively chose to direct spend to DJ, CX, EK most of last year after a string of "disasters" with QF (incl. the lack of response to complaint emails/feedback forms).
Ironically, I have been woo'ed back to QF since making WP (qualf almost exclusively on CX legs) due to their outstanding team @ the MEL F lounge and performance of their premium desk w/ opening up award flights. It's really not that hard to get it right. One could say its the WP in us, but who doesn't like being treated well esp when $25-30k has been paid to get there. Seriously, its a lot of money at an absolute level - even if it's employer funded. I was once told by someone: "In the hospitality industry, be lavish to your customers if you want them to be lavish to you"
I think docjames is on the money with the idea of anytime upgrades; QF could impose different burn rates which would be +ve for revenue. If the facility was restricted to WPs only, it could be a step in the right direction to restoring our trust (as long as the burn rate wasn't ridiculous). Given QF's home base status and decent equipment (744 refresh; more A380s & 787s on the horizon), there is no real reason EK, DL, VA, etc. should ever be able to make any money if QF can retain a firm grip on premium traffic. Treating WPs properly is probably a good first step to doing so.... and IMHO, beats engaging in a premium traffic price war.
Agree, but HKG is a v. busy airport. The lounges are also huge (there are 4 lounges now if the arrival is counted) and real estate is v. expensive in HK. Further, the selection of food & bev at the wing, pier and the cabin (reportedly; i'll find out in a few weeks) is vastly superior to anything QF has except Syd/Mel F lounge. While i certainly don't have any solid figures on me, I'd think its hard to definitively say anytime access for MPC DMs is "cheaper" than for QF WPs on a per member basis.
Ironically, I have been woo'ed back to QF since making WP (qualf almost exclusively on CX legs) due to their outstanding team @ the MEL F lounge and performance of their premium desk w/ opening up award flights. It's really not that hard to get it right. One could say its the WP in us, but who doesn't like being treated well esp when $25-30k has been paid to get there. Seriously, its a lot of money at an absolute level - even if it's employer funded. I was once told by someone: "In the hospitality industry, be lavish to your customers if you want them to be lavish to you"
I think docjames is on the money with the idea of anytime upgrades; QF could impose different burn rates which would be +ve for revenue. If the facility was restricted to WPs only, it could be a step in the right direction to restoring our trust (as long as the burn rate wasn't ridiculous). Given QF's home base status and decent equipment (744 refresh; more A380s & 787s on the horizon), there is no real reason EK, DL, VA, etc. should ever be able to make any money if QF can retain a firm grip on premium traffic. Treating WPs properly is probably a good first step to doing so.... and IMHO, beats engaging in a premium traffic price war.
[CX] probably have about the same number of international lounges, although QF teams up with BA a lot, while I don’t think CX do.
I do agree that they understand what loyalty means a lot more, although in that case, loyalty to the alliance, not really to Cathay Pacific if you’re a 1W elite ;p
Agree, but HKG is a v. busy airport. The lounges are also huge (there are 4 lounges now if the arrival is counted) and real estate is v. expensive in HK. Further, the selection of food & bev at the wing, pier and the cabin (reportedly; i'll find out in a few weeks) is vastly superior to anything QF has except Syd/Mel F lounge. While i certainly don't have any solid figures on me, I'd think its hard to definitively say anytime access for MPC DMs is "cheaper" than for QF WPs on a per member basis.