I don't understandIf the majority of Aussies don’t want to travel, fine. Why not include them? (they won’t be flying anyway) As soon as we start restricting it to privileged people I think the messaging suffers
I don't understandIf the majority of Aussies don’t want to travel, fine. Why not include them? (they won’t be flying anyway) As soon as we start restricting it to privileged people I think the messaging suffers
I would want all public officials to follow your suggestionsNow if I were PM and a certain State Premier asked for an Exemption to travel to Tokyo for the Olympics I would as k the Department to grant it.
But for the application to return I would be a naughty boy and propose they did one of two options.
1.Deny the application for exemption so that they may realise what Australians OS are experiencing.
2.Grant the application to return but make HQ mandatory.Therefore realise what other ordinary Australians even some travelling domestically to their State have gone through.
PS this post is in jest and is not a political statement.
If the majority of Aussies don’t want to travel, fine. Why not include them? (they won’t be flying anyway) As soon as we start restricting it to privileged people I think the messaging suffers
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
I still don’t understand- exclude how and from what? I’m referring to your response to my comment where I listed a number of ways they could incentivise people who don’t want to travel overseas.If it is true that the majority of Aussies ‘don’t care’ about overseas travel, and won’t go anyway, why exclude them from the ‘opening up’ plan? At the moment the focus is on business travellers and students, and I dare say that grates with the aussies that are excluded from that group. Why not say ‘hey, we get everyone vaccinated and everyone will be free to travel’?
It’s important to distinguish between a lot of people saying something, and you simply saying the same thing again and again and again and again.If it is true that the majority of Aussies ‘don’t care’ about overseas travel, and won’t go anyway, why exclude them from the ‘opening up’ plan? At the moment the focus is on business travellers and students, and I dare say that grates with the aussies that are excluded from that group. Why not say ‘hey, we get everyone vaccinated and everyone will be free to travel’?
I still don’t understand- exclude how and from what? I’m referring to your response to my comment where I listed a number of ways they could incentivise people who don’t want to travel overseas.
Maybe... but those working in health care, or in contact with the most vulnerable, may still require frequent testing. If one nurse in a covid ward gets the virus, it could mean all staff that were primary contacts need to isolate, etc. Lots of things to be worked out.
I don't understand
It was mentioned several times that the Fedex crew tested negative.Actually that is not what was said at all. I watched that broadcast. Dr Chant confirmed authorities hadn’t been able to definitively confirm (thats is very different to ruling it out) the limo driver was patient zero, but his genome sequencing matched that of the Delta variant that had been recorded in the US.
Other countries dont have the same test regimes for air crew, so we may never get a test result to provide an exact link to an individual, but that doesnt mean they were not the source.
“Obviously at the beginning when we have a diagnosis in someone who transports flight crew, I think that it is reasonable that we would make that assumption, and that is probably on strong epidemiological grounds, that that is likely to be the hypothesis,” she said.
When asked about the limos driver claim that he caught it at the cafe, Dr Chantt gave it no credence and that he should come forward if he had extra information to share but they had not found in any of the testing done here an earlier genomic link than the drivers.
You need to remember at that time the driver was being threatened with legal action so in his interests to circulate another theory to cast doubt on where he got to dflect from not wearing PPE, being vaccinated or testign regularly.
The flight crew remains the assumed source.
So those that have the financial means can do whatever they want and those that don't, cannot. The Goldman's theory.If you can’t afford the bond then you should only be allowed to leave the country if you meet existing exemption criteria and do hotel quarantine. We’re talking about ways to relax the restrictions for more people to be able to travel above the existing caps. Fines are not as effective as bonds. With bonds the fines are prepaid whereas with fines some may choose not to pay and potentially get away with it. So fines alone are nowhere near as effective a deterrent to doing the wrong thing.
A bond would also help to sort out whether trips are really important or not. If they are important then you will find a way to find the cash for it.
I haven't heard anyone say "exclude" others. I have heard start with...which is not the same thing. Also, I have agreed that the messaging should be broader, focusing on all the other items I listed above which go well beyond the international border.Excluding anyone who’s not a business traveller from being eligible to travel once borders start to open. What’s the incentive in the current messaging? You get vaccinated so someone else can go on a business trip (cough) holiday?
Easy as you can use a list of acceptable vaccines.There is a lot of concern the Sinopharm and Sinovac vaccines are not effective against Delta variants (hence latest wave in countries Indonesia, Cambodia, etc that have used those vaccines). If the Australian gov relaxes quarantine for 'fully vaccinated' students (and travellers) vaccinated with less effective vaccines, that's going to be a complete mess.
We'll end up going back to stage one ad infinitum because the students are wanted from countries where less effective vaccines are used.
Hasnt that always been the way of the world? Can't afford to fly? You don't. Can't afford to buy a house? Rent.So those that have the financial means can do whatever they want and those that don't, cannot. The Goldman's theory.
0.000001% of the population is 0.255 people.While I have sympathy for your situation and without going into my own, we cannot make national policy based on 0.000001% of the population. If she has that threatening a condition, is immunocompromised and is unable to be vaccinated then i probably should have added another zero, but my advice would be for her not to be around children at all as they are germ factories.
Once you are stranded overseas despite having a previously ticketed return flight - then allowing the 'elite' to do as they wish is more akin to Russia, North Korea & China than a supposedly Western democracy called Australia. AFter all a reasonable number were stranded due to Q pulling the plug on international operations on June 9th, 2020.Hasnt that always been the way of the world? Can't afford to fly? You don't. Can't afford to buy a house? Rent.
But NZ seems to have done this well. I don't think anyone is arguing against their model.
After it came back that the flight crew tested negative it was no longer reasonable.
After it came back that the flight crew tested negative it was no longer reasonable.
Easy as you can use a list of acceptable vaccines.
Greece initially listed only vaccines approved by the EMA.
But recently a backflip and they now accept all vaccines.
Surely not related to this.
China's Xi on investment drive in EU member Greece
China and Greece have signed 16 bilateral agreements outlining cooperation in a broad range of sectors during a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping aimed at furthering a major global investment initiative inside the European Unionabcnews.go.com