I'm not sure if that reasoning holds true.
The thing is we don't 'accept' 1000+ roads deaths a year. The aim of most governments is now along the lines of 'towards zero'. Driving is highly regulated... seat belts, severe speed limits in cities, limits of engine capacity for new drivers, speed cameras, can't even touch your phone while the engine is running. There are severe penalties including gaol if your driving causes injury to others.
Aviation... we don't accept a single death there. The entire MAX fleet was grounded, as have other models when problems occur. A single accident can impose multi-million dollar obligations on airlines to fix an issue or change procedures.
Alcohol is also highly regulated. There are multiple restrictions and bans in place to regulate its use and minimise its harm. I'd argue we don't 'accept' alcohol related deaths.
I don't think we accept the flu either... but we have a vaccine for that. We also have the 'no jab, no play' policy for other diseases. A 'freedom' taken away from people for arguably a very limited benefit (given most kids are willingly vaccinated by parents, why impose such a draconian measure for the remaining few who refuse?)
I'm note sure there is exaggeration by experts. We saw India, USA, Europe, UK, South America....