The downgrading of the travel advisories this week on the Smartraveller website have highlighted the absolute farce and lack of independence of the advisories.
The Smartraveller
website states, "Our advisories are an objective assessment of the risks Australians face overseas. They're not impacted by diplomatic, political or commercial considerations."
Really? What exactly was the "objective assessment" of what I assume is about 90% of countries which this week saw them all of a sudden drop from "Do not travel" to "Exercise a high degree of caution" or "Reconsider your need to travel"? It's quite a coincidence, don't you think, that 28 October saw nearly ever monitored country lose its "Do not travel" designation. What changed in all these countries, on one single day, that they miraculously no longer posed an "
extreme risk [to] your health and safety"? Conversely, what was the "extreme risk" to travellers wanting to travel to New Zealand or a number of Pacific island countries where covid infection rates per capita have been next to zero for the bulk of the pandemic?
Not political, my cough.