I have heard that many of the "trapped" Australians are dual citizens,or in India's case holders of an ICO card,and so not really trapped but will feel safer in Australia with the Covid situation where they are situated out of control.Explains why articles usually say that the countries where most are trapped are India and the Phillipines.
Brings up the question of why should we be paying for evacuation flights.Certainly should continue to pay for quarantine.
But likewise I've read many stories of those who are genuinely trapped in places like the UK, one woman posted from Cyprus I think it was who has a teenager family in Victoria and had left Aus in early March and borders in Cyprus were closed in mid March and only just reopened in July but they cant afford a $15000 airfare and their original flights have been cancelled. So there are very much genuine cases out there as well.
Definitely genuine cases out there - & for no real need, just Fed Govt looking at voting blocs....
The problem though is there does not need to be a single one if the Federal Govt actually implemented what has been announced repeatedly - only Australians permitted to return. No mention of non-Australians who are 'close relatives' also allowed & using up a good proportion of the available seat capacity.
To put that in perspective:
1) When an airline that is still prepared to fly to Australia is limited to just 30 passengers on board - the economics do not stack up unless the bulk are paying business class fares. Does anyone think Q has gotten off lightly by refusing to fly unless guaranteed the Fed Govt fully underwrites their international flights? After all the Fed Govt has paid Q $267m from late March to 30 June 2020 in JobKeeper payments, which is more than Q's reported underlying profit....
Also worth noting that Q has called domestic flights 'repatriation flights' - close to 60% of Q's repatriation' flights charged to the Fed Govt were domestic NOT international.
Have not seen one media article pointing out that Q has stopped being an Australian flag carrier (since early June) & people returning mostly relying on Qatar.
2) The 3 flights from Tibet (into Melb) in early June were not Q flights for example, but foreign companies. Made a profit as 100% filled each plane. Highlighted the issue though as I was told (reliably) that 60%+ were neither Aust citizens nor permanent residents but close relatives of one (supposedly although some were believed to be brought in by people smugglers).
3) DFAT reported in early August that there are just 27,000 'Australians' registered with them under the CV register, of whom only 18,800 indicated they would like to return to Australia. DFAT noted that of the 18,800 many were not 'desperate' nor 'under compassionate' reasons to return (not waiting on getting a ticket).
4) Current weekly capacity is sufficient to bring all 18,800 home within 5 weeks if the arriving capacity restrained flights are restricted to solely carrying whoever DFAT calls 'Australians'. If a large chunk of that capacity is bringing in close residents of dual nationals then that is an entirely different picture - and the media are refusing to publicise this. I know as I've emailed the DFAT figures, statements from various Federal depts etc to them & asked if they could look into it & report what they find. Result = silence.
5) Current limits inbound limits AFASIK:
- Sydney - 350/day = 2,450 / week
- Perth - 525 / week
- Brisbane - 500 / week
- Adelaide - 500 / week
6) Airlines as you'd expect are selling to whoever will (can afford) pay for the business class fares in preference to economy in an attempt to try to cover costs - Australian citizens, Aust permanent residents & close relatives of either group.
7) DFAT reported that of the 18,800 who wish to return to Australia (some time or urgently), around 70% are currently in (most to least):
- India
- The Philipines
- South Africa
- Vietnam
Yet the image that is being played out in the media paints a completely different picture.
8) DFAT has organised (to date) 64 repatriation flights - with the majority not flown by Q. Of the 64 flights, 13 were from India or approx 20% ( DFAT reported). I know that 3 were from Tibet (surprised me - roughly same population as Australia!).
__________________________
All things being equal, if the bulk of people coming into Australia are NOT 'close relatives' then by Sept 11th there should be no Australians who want to return to Australia that were unable to be carried.
For some reason, I don't expect that will be the headline!
Last edited: