Coo, narrow body on a plane from Aust to SIN, now that is real cheapo now.
Real cheapskate.
Aust - NZ on a narrow body plane, maybe in J, but to SIN cooped up in a narrow body down the back in discY, coo, that will be a pain ful experience.
Rubbish. You're totally ignoring the hash realities.
1. ADL clearly doesn't have the demand (at least for QF to make it work) to support the larger aircraft you prefer.
Yes, I know you will point to SQ throwing 350's and whatever into ADL - but that's because that's flying into their hub and the economies are different.
2. You may have your head in the sand but narrowbodies have been commonly used trans atlantic flights of 6-8ish hours (akin to ADL-SIN) for years and years. Heck, I saw a thing just yesterday about IcelandAir flying KEF-YVR in a 757.
3. The experience in Y on an A321XLR might actually be a bit better than you think due to the slightly wider cabin width. Sure, it depends how QF configure these things, but there is scope for a Y experience - at least seating and cabin - akin to a SQ A350 (obviously the soft product would probably be much worse).
I think there is an inherent bias for widebodies. I do absolutely understand this - specially in J - but SQ's 737 MAX J, B6 Mint in the 321, even lie flat seats on the likes of UA mean that J can still work in a narrow body.
I recently saw one of the well known youtube bloggers (Nonstop Dan) do a trip on a SK A321XLR from GOT to... gee I want to say NYC but it may have been somewhere else. A very secondary market which SK just couldn't make happen from a place like GOT, but the 321 worked. He was in J, but really made the point that it worked better and the product was NOT that much worse (comparing SK products) than in the mainline, and he avoided a connecting flight in somewhere like ARN or CPH.
This would be similar for ADL pax who might want to go to SIN (for perhaps further into Asia from there) - save a few hours by bypassing MEL/SYD/PER and go direct almost certainly preferable. This is exactly what this aircraft was designed to do. Much like the 787 was to open up the longer routes without the demand profile for a 747/380 (and look at how well that has worked), this is where the 321XLR fits - you can't fill an A330-200/300, but could make it work with the 321.
You might call it cheap - but I do not. Definitely economics at play but should QF actually FLY ADL-SIN (and that's debateable because.. well... QF) it makes a LOT of sense economically to fly and open up the route for folks in ADL.
What does this even mean?