pauly7
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Posts
- 5,360
Still hoping for a last minute change from San Fran to Seattle!
But very happy with the Chicago move.
Until they've sat in a 9 across 787 Y seat for 15 hours.10000% percent. I strongly suspect most people given a choice and all other things equal would pick direct.
Ouch!Until they've sat in a 9 across 787 Y seat for 15 hours.
Depending on class of course. 6 hours in Y is the absolute maximum my body can tolerate and even that is pushing it10000% percent. I strongly suspect most people given a choice and all other things equal would pick direct.
I started getting W and J tickets for flights over ~2 hours because my knees don't like Y anymore.Depending on class of course. 6 hours in Y is the absolute maximum my body can tolerate and even that is pushing it
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Qantas is set to grow its network in the United States, with the national carrier confirming it will fly directly from Brisbane to Chicago and San Francisco upon approval of its joint business with American Airlines from the United States Department of Transportation (DOT).
QANTAS SETS SIGHTS ON DIRECT FLIGHTS FROM BRISBANE TO CHICAGO AND SAN FRANCISCO
Keep up to date with Qantas' latest news and information, media releases, articles, images and more with the Qantas News Room.www.qantasnewsroom.com.au
Until they've sat in a 9 across 787 Y seat for 15 hours.
All personal preference but I’d much rather a direct get it over and done with!
Now that’s an announcement!. Though with an *. But that’s OkFinally, the QF announcement, today.
I think we might see two of these available number pairs, or 55/56 (with the 3 weekly LAX flight going), for the BNE-ORD and BNE-SFO flights.QF uses QF1-199 for own metal international. Here's a list. Might be missing a few, mainly NZ/South Pacific flights.
...
QF45 MEL-DPS
QF46 DPS-MEL
QF47
QF48
QF49 MEL-SFO
QF50 SFO-MEL
QF51 BNE-SIN
QF52 SIN-BNE
QF53
QF54
QF55 BNE-LAX
QF56 LAX-BNE
QF57 BNE-POM
QF58 POM-BNE
QF59
QF60
QF61 BNE-NRT
QF62 NRT-BNE
...
Has QF actually said that? Because 3x SFO and 4x ORD does not fit with the claim in the QF media release of 14 weekly BNE-US and 14 weekly AU-SFO. In order to match what the QF release has said, it needs to be daily BNE-LAX (with aircraft continuing to JFK as extension of SYD flight), 4 weekly BNE-SFO and 3 weekly BNE-ORD for 14 weekly BNE-US (while existing 6 weekly SYD-SFO and 4 weekly MEL-SFO along with new 4 weekly BNE-SFO makes 14 weekly AU-SFO)Well the frequencies ex-BNE has been sorted.
BNE-SFO: x3 weekly (replacing QF55/56)
BNE-ORD: x4 weekly
BNE-LAX-JFK: Daily
QF55/56 BNE-LAX-BNE will be cancelled to accomodate the SFO and ORD flying.
Executive Traveller formerly AusBT | Travel News, Reviews & More
The global destination for business travellers and premium frequent flyers: news, reviews and expert guides to help you travel better.www.ausbt.com.au
the distance BNE/SFO is less than BNE/LAX & SFO seems to be a much better planned airport & has hire cars on the airport train line. Pity it can't start before Arpil.press release is up
QANTAS SETS SIGHTS ON DIRECT FLIGHTS FROM BRISBANE TO CHICAGO AND SAN FRANCISCO
Keep up to date with Qantas' latest news and information, media releases, articles, images and more with the Qantas News Room.www.qantasnewsroom.com.au
BNE-ORD and SFO confirmed. To start in April.
Has QF actually said that? Because 3x SFO and 4x ORD does not fit with the claim in the QF media release of 14 weekly BNE-US and 14 weekly AU-SFO.